Re: [netmod] Tomorrow's Interim Meeting Details

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Thu, 10 September 2015 01:01 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C451B50A9 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8348nj2bVZmX for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com (mail-la0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526911B4F27 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagj9 with SMTP id j9so18191791lag.2 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rh05XXidfAkNZtuL1ahA3/9gQ12lC2ZK9QrQcr5kTLw=; b=hXmLH0SJlQ+4Nj0aNafFGiu/eZLLU/ndYebB88klZWFvv7oTMrXM5yaYWlZkUy1OBJ tJxSmt+7q9vQ6OUZ9BXBywbkHj9IY7RqPyxYrxRVXFTYXits6GAALPBeBEMH0FnCuA07 NiA1s1Za7AlnsioN6bzKuMKYeu/35ZCXfyL3YmUByh8+3uhoHObZ4sAF33+v6Tm4m8vX KvUj76Rydy7zu6lrg/c8cdkXDalWi8/CwyWqLrMwXBcT3TZvsreU5N+46XwNIKr6eKjx NEb96nqWB6Fb5LPczRvKuSOY0lc3yVuOk3Hn3OwYsXV5K1pk4MQNb12mq57Hcar8yVc/ cU8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZH1uYxsV67RN68e9Dndy6d6ukF77SQHjqproNXyPP0Oux9iBKN9tWwNdm8x19GZ6pOT9O
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.120.198 with SMTP id le6mr32347331lab.38.1441846864325; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.200.104 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <861BC101-6333-4FDC-92BB-BD9D2A7C52BC@lucidvision.com>
References: <861BC101-6333-4FDC-92BB-BD9D2A7C52BC@lucidvision.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:01:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHS8UjMBCBnFJbDoD9YsrJgwp3jNXj5kMzTJc1_fAsPfOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e011769052b4d93051f5a2289"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/I6clHE2665C40taRZHi0CKLD46U>
Cc: netmod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Tomorrow's Interim Meeting Details
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:01:10 -0000

Hi,

This email and the one from Benoit do not mention any sort of problem scope.
IMO it would be useful to know if the scope includes all YANG modules, only
IETF
YANG modules, or perhaps only IETF routing modules. As the scope gets wider,
the probability that "1 size fits all" goes way down.


Andy


On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
wrote:

>
>         I wanted to set things up for the interim meeting tomorrow. To
> frame the meeting, we want to achieve two main goals:
>
>         1) close on requirements around a requirement to define a
> structure for IETF models and the requirements around ops state/models
>
>         2) discuss/debate/understand the differences between the 3
> different solution approaches as described in
> draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01, draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate,
> draft-wilton-netmod-opstate-yang.  While I understand the last two drafts
> are relatively new, they are there and have been for a time sufficient to
> read and ask questions on the list of the authors.
>
>         To this end, I’d like to steer the discussion in the direction of
> having direct questions/debate over those solutions. I’d like a
> representative author from each draft lead each of their sections.   If
> time still exists, I’d like to let Kent (speaking as co-chair), objectively
> compare pros/cons of each solution.  I understand that we allocated an hour
> for tomorrow. We incorrectly anticipated a single draft to be compared to
> the existing opsstate draft.  If we need additional time, a second meeting
> will be planned for hopefully next week, so that we can tie things off.
>
>
>         This is the proposed agenda for tomorrow’s meeting.
>
>         0) Agenda Bashing - Tom/2 min
>
>         1) Statement from the AD:
>                 Please read
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg13510.html
>
>         1) Requirements - Tom/15 min
>           - goal is to close on consensus (to be confirmed on list)
>               on the problem statement/requirements, as described in
>               draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01, Sections 3 & 4, and
>               implied in draft-openconfig-netmod-model-structure-00
>               (yes, we'll need to write them down), as well as any
>               other requirements not covered by the above.
>             - please come prepared to discuss and finalize these
>
>
>         2) Questions/Comments about each specific draft - 15 minutes for
> each
>                 A rep for each draft (Martin?, Wilton?, Anees?)
>
>            - to be led by a representative for each draft
>               (Martin?, Wilton?, Anees?)
>             - this is not intended to be a presentation of these solution
>               so much as an opportunity to ask questions of the authors
>               regarding any aspect of the presented solution.
>             - everyone should come prepared having already read these
> drafts.
>             - if there are no questions, we'll move on to the next draft
>               right away.
>
>         3) Compare and contrast the solutions () - rest of the time, if
> time permits. Kent (as co-chair)
>
>             - goal is to up-level the conversation to direct comparison
>               of the various solutions.
>
>
>         Finally, I’d like to ask for a volunteer to take notes as well as
> someone to run the Etherpad.
>
>
>         WebEx Details:
>
>
>
>
> >>>
> >>> NETMOD Working Group invites you to join this WebEx meeting.
> >>>
> >>> NETMOD Interm meeting on OpenConfig
> >>> Thursday, September 10, 2015
> >>> 11:00 am  |  Eastern Daylight Time (New York, GMT-04:00)  |  1 hr
> >>>
> >>> Join WebEx meeting
> >>> Meeting number:     645 732 277
> >>> Meeting password:   1234
> >>>
> >>> Join by phone
> >>> 1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll free number (US/Canada)
> >>> 1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada)
> >>> Access code: 645 732 277
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>