[netmod] comments on draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg--05
Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Thu, 12 June 2014 21:49 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2A11A02A2 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DkyFl7vaForK for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f50.google.com (mail-qa0-f50.google.com [209.85.216.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71391A0276 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m5so2421270qaj.9 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BsCHiwbnRAyLyNXvb2r8mm6wKYaPn86xiEeuOyHLPOQ=; b=da8gJQ3ZMV2J0b0tkJ13ZmAFBKpoLx0X1r3mwDj24eIAlhadlv5haRpma62GW/arvP 32alRtIgo9vKyFVKnkSKJQ9BrysCe1Ib9YKRbMqeqQRPij+OCc9DmXNXEfjwCjgeGU6j zHzLS5Uy7oJzNJEyrzuBFxxoo2Ztkmfrbdlymbh8e7A8qe8gs+htLdFyq4NfCYMfmlY0 zekxBY67DGdwoHTxmcsoCPyM+BL7Zq0m8xURJbEjINNtBvlVfxfNxOgzSimKITif36gK 6NOKdYZybdZMUCPWkSQLvf5iM1Z4PSJC3G/7w9hsChiucpVX3uahGCb2sCRo3ACRRiPi zJAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmlobfGQtfPDwm8IlXn5UpWdyOE7J0eXC9CC341HHq2q+HrpKRipBA5fptpbrSr17jssVul
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.36.37 with SMTP id o34mr8527662qgo.25.1402609767117; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.104.49 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:49:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQnzdvOGGLDSOrNsRrW19aDvRNs+o9D-sqgqjtx21WN+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c15a48eda62b04fbaa880d"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KLT9YhAX2rl4SuWmyJXrbr9b0Cw
Subject: [netmod] comments on draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg--05
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:49:29 -0000
Hi, It's probably past WG Last Call, but I still do not understand the value of splitting the ietf-snmp configuration module into 12 files (1 main + 11 sub-modules) instead of just 1 file. IMO it makes it harder to read, not easier, and wrt/ YANG library management, there are 12 files to update and keep in sync, instead of 1. Is there some expectation that individual sub-modules for SNMP configuration will be updated regularly in new RFCs? Andy
- [netmod] comments on draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-cfg--… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] comments on draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-c… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] comments on draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-c… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] comments on draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-c… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] comments on draft-ietf-netmod-snmp-c… Juergen Schoenwaelder