Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 02 November 2016 14:14 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A859E129673; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QTwZ9msXxNhm; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38B55129665; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 07:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCD7BE47; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:14:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jp07QxCl523A; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:14:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC262BE32; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 14:14:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1478096062; bh=Up9irTpDfwsd1hC78uiSF6s8CKvgq43H4ScCT1r1sVw=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=H0Gb7Sl3VvdK0asiL7La2bxrE+xXFAgRlEr4i36loqdzO1f9h24AGzAx06v64iRdD nC4V9NeGy4mQoB8/dfqtPdStp+dHBx8OYkffN9C9j0E4eArYJCyt+4A0YndzPZ4scI tAbtYvwU4Ph9gYsZkypRt4GNlgcCrWorLgO7MENc=
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
References: <147808398811.24141.15196130392409336719.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A7A00C9E-D76E-4BE3-8022-D2269E3D1F5B@nic.cz>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <12326933-2397-817d-bfde-d6572bb46d06@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:14:21 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A7A00C9E-D76E-4BE3-8022-D2269E3D1F5B@nic.cz>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090906020809020202000608"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KSiPaaggSurL69kq62Tm8XEXEV0>
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:14:28 -0000
On 02/11/16 14:04, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> On 2 Nov 2016, at 11:53, Stephen Farrell >> <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: >> >> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to >> all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to >> cut this introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to >> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more >> information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found >> here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> If there exists a draft for a yang module that augments this >> in a way that includes cryptographic values (e.g. maybe for an >> IPsec VPN or something) then I think that'd be a nice addition to >> section 11 as an informative reference. > > One such module is ietf-key-chain by Acee et al. [1] Would it make > sense to include an informative reference to it? Not sure, but I think maybe not. Acee's draft doesn't seem to augment the modules defined in this one which is what I thought might provide useful information. S. > > Lada > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-10 > >> >> > > -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C > > > >
- [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on dr… Acee Lindem (acee)