IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 01 November 2016 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6591299F8; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FofcxG8JVPMj; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:55:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5DE01296A9; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1492; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1478033704; x=1479243304; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=SzHWj9CgE1CGCACIpwyNuclQ2ueTaSMKyc3OZAr9Wyw=; b=bHA8NzdPomS7LUcO57vVrSv+BX6lrR55UCWr7zbzZf9kRHENro3OZGjW vurH7mdP3w2zKgtHlXf4mgSFNkpC2guUeJ5zn/EUDIKIVTMmj4MXIYQtn 9qhf6w81hTvM9ctSrbZFrKAdCfsP1p4jAzYcvoFp8TQOpRYHtphUDXNBi Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B1AQCaABlY/5JdJa1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgyoBAQEBAR9YfAeNL6k2gg+CByiFegIagXw/FAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGIBAQQjEUUQAgEIGgImAgICMBUQAgQBDQWIVA6rPYx/AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFwWBB4oLhBkRARyDBIJcBYhGkVQBhjCKBIFuhG6JKpEWAR42YINYgTtyAYUvgSCBDAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,433,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="164132870"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Nov 2016 20:55:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA1Kt2d4019831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 20:55:02 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:55:01 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:55:01 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSNH0xNvUC0RN8V02rjfcnMnXNHKDEm3CA
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:55:01 +0000
Message-ID: <D43E7868.8712E%acee@cisco.com>
References: <147803154180.23820.9214684669050491573.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <147803154180.23820.9214684669050491573.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <430579B1CE94614080B2F11E1B7ED37B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/PqAVQi32mI-WMZUeioJ_liIS_IU>
Cc: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:55:05 -0000

Hi Ben, 

On 11/1/16, 4:19 PM, "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

>Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: No Objection
>
>When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg/
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>COMMENT:
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Should the reference to 6536. Be normative?

I certainly don’t think so. This is simply an informative reference
describing the NETCONF access control model. The model in the draft is in
no way dependent on this model.

Thanks,
Acee 



>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email