[netmod] instance file parsing

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Fri, 30 November 2018 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21590130EB3 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:48:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-1.459, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tyUQQmlDn9yT for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:48:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06D5130E9A for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:48:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id s5-v6so5709315ljd.12 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:48:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s+NNazOgyArlUWbkMi/9T/aQfuovrxw0J0bXbZvAeLk=; b=eUPAMIhXH0FMnl60dcs4IK9SE3WZsxv6/Mo+Mog243kQFp3oEDnUPFFY+kibb80OAP G4w6xDQGQPL4R8P4sw1+shAXFgtnL19hSGHmE54aMcyBMckdUJN/mUQKS3/ov1SS0dgJ PzkJdG6E5u4oiBRy703H7ai79kUoS/O8UuiVIhmnm1kmEWZGoAA+WZ8HDDIBxh4p2JrQ jiIrGEvCXsrhTIpzDMG0yDNU9ad5OK4SZfAQKeLjtIq+UNtMCY47uiM/jjmvRt++RiSo 4d+Autxnb+Z+/oe1WFjezqbe9plmxWD9DJ8QkUPknohlQB75qXom+h7D1XEu6MtMObYe 3pWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s+NNazOgyArlUWbkMi/9T/aQfuovrxw0J0bXbZvAeLk=; b=jgSd/wCICejL8vJBYtzzWxhwTKkGT9b/J/DNmMi1yafJuSWLpmaEcYM/St2CY/HvdC UKydY7sT5ebHFQQmexMaQ45rOQIzFJyVELRFtP7CM6FOjk/a5Gd2jzJBllOu7eOEKkcZ cxRqebetLiLmMNrvgbjht00qzRp5MdBcwsD1A/xksjENVC6TeeAoFLIZjkM0nCcqKdRA Hf2H3WUse9wbUYhuhgTy+tpyiUIwGEuoFj6TNJJDENNfAzvap8GJOj1iQ0yViI6D2d2L ZWQj+PqokwH8WJ8lXDfwFu1DbhxW9ZQYXkBtGtkpiAz5xcSbmCl5Z/ne4NVCIlexa9Ax ZiLA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbcsjWVoPZ6r5neXwzY7Crh7Xqz7clrkWG7gNphKuaTfqIyfD+J sBWI1vuhiOjO6WP3g40gJapqNdUIq1Xg6I+BkFOWO2k5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WbCPSnJy98Miyhjvkmhuy/dpt+dT6bbDnkn/nXW6zCyKLxUry1miM/jeSHI2SZLwTFBQv6nEHcOaHWCb0eYp0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2019:: with SMTP id g25-v6mr4254098ljg.20.1543600092251; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:48:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:48:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQYR_iY7Lp=0m8D-GQ8+Rzuijaa8_41bJw6ZvWPc+Cw_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ca183057be567b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/XeVIr7BvmuJuV0iWpbZwMVaWHLk>
Subject: [netmod] instance file parsing
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:48:17 -0000

Hi,

I don't see much standards value in this draft so far.
It seems the parser of the file needs to know the YANG library information
for the instance file data in some out-of-scope non-standard manner.
This is what we already have today just by naming the file in a specific
way.

Is the intent that the instance-data-set leafs will be used to determine
the module revisions, features, and deviations used in the children
or the 'data' node?

Andy