Re: [netmod] import from another SDO

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 21 August 2019 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA171208C7; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 02:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=AZkHUw+/; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=eE/fq+So
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0sfxDFvrlDG; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 02:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB61C12084E; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 02:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1807; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1566378849; x=1567588449; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=zMFf3XP3J3qOLAKrekWQRu6ZPojMVdLsOtP2kSieGp4=; b=AZkHUw+/GhU9asohE1jU1+zb2QiNeBG2JkVJJb59VKYyZrDnanbX82s4 FUJtVhkVgFhqbo8tRCkssPP4eQKHtp30v8Ec/0140KaPI4qYo+wJTE8PI QsPOvp59bL15YjJ7u57E6kME3RXnZ/Mc7ZcAqnBKZN6PS+eDD6uudsUf/ 0=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AALDoghA6rKGAQh+rj/OjUyQJPHJ1sqjoPgMT9p?= =?us-ascii?q?ssgq5PdaLm5Zn5IUjD/qs13kTRU9Dd7PRJw6rNvqbsVHZIwK7JsWtKMfkuHw?= =?us-ascii?q?QAld1QmgUhBMCfDkiuNuHrazA9GuxJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ANAABvCl1d/4oNJK1kGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBVAQBAQEBCwGBRFADbVUgBAsqCodcA4p8glyXZYEugSQDVAk?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEMAQEYDQgCAQGDekUCglojNQgOAgUBAQQBAQMBBgRthScMhUoBAQEBAwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BECgGAQEsCwELBAIBCBEEAQEfECcLHQgCBAENBQgagwGBagMdAQIMnzoCgTi?= =?us-ascii?q?IYYIlgnsBAQWBMgETQYMNGIIUAwaBNAGLaBiBQD+BV4JMPoJhAQEDAYFfgzu?= =?us-ascii?q?CJqtZCQKCHYZojWyCMZYVjVuBNoYtkCsCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVIBNYFYcBU7gmy?= =?us-ascii?q?CQoNyhRSFP3IBgSiMGgGBIAEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,412,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="616564116"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 Aug 2019 09:14:08 +0000
Received: from xch-rcd-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7L9E88I029930 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:14:08 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 04:14:08 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 04:14:01 -0500
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 04:14:01 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=GWWUe+KvR/3APXtxPk5IYMs7GKqTUsHRzf0978lSX2rzG0gYTU7bPj+Q0fwz5x8/DMLp5D+ZuBN1Mz4Rx6CIjBoG0iAhNVeJaVKRUqiQ+88VBtT4QOTeTylJeUfJFTDvlaKvq4Ro85WAmGaWHLSbmBD6gbcs38Xh2yCiT3jDK4pnkhXvwpKq/8VNfo72OmhW6d611ffIFhgLfws/iJZ/tNXRv/nrUluVsk5+L1atjTnpd0a7OhiEH0jtKGm9OWqb6j08ZV8CXjFkOz8/pL/cIDbnGlP4wOXhlEe8iBFFHIgHjpVynQZUwC7q6QBCsgjnpT2+oNc3mXknR1Pj+qDv7A==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=W+83Uy5Kio129bqAvbSxtZ4a19g0HXhEJmgbeCZDEdA=; b=lQ1CWMdYNVT9isVewjmKYeI3EnS0zFTp3FqqJAQoIctQ3WgJ67jvLYMUn2WkknAPu9ZhtR7tcL3P+FveYVxyYQ7rGSbR+0R5m9ae9BjCxnhSDpKDjPkcqmVCPtgJhDjddk52Mv5DCLsw1g8oWTUejedjt8KB7EIQw/tWVh7ZG5zx8v0xyf3rBCGqiVjBKrfZoeL/e9UrO30Ai6EuRx1lzf0U+z2tnaDWK70DbLZRNLPSq5iV08iRGX9CXFE8oL2VaZ/MarZDm4LWQ9UQWUa5hnip4/CgBL2w5diCz2WJW53Ak/L9nGh9ZLr615qK/5TqLCUEkCLnoj9T42DvAFvv3g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=W+83Uy5Kio129bqAvbSxtZ4a19g0HXhEJmgbeCZDEdA=; b=eE/fq+Son+/KVD522cJlOrOHkDsyTfmiaVrYqIqKTx5Fl/XkA6B6nCWocO6TPppbkwpeDLEfz+xBUINK83rUZGDY1LwibavbbqW/R8pwgLD91qYo0A3MbtndYpFDETkXsUTv0my5mv0aQydS2BQS6xiJAQ1YQ+oyGfkNMoGc0xk=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.209) by MN2PR11MB3789.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.252.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2178.19; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:14:00 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6db3:f4c:467b:30f6]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6db3:f4c:467b:30f6%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2178.020; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:14:00 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, "Scott Mansfield" <scott.mansfield@ericsson.com>
CC: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: import from another SDO
Thread-Index: AQHVV/34Pp+u/WtfuUWDW61TnnDvKKcFTssg
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:14:00 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB4366AE8B95FC750F3ABADF26B5AA0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <c6f3a9dc-2f2e-750b-a3b9-6d4708aa25ab@labn.net> <00b801d557fd$ba9d21a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <00b801d557fd$ba9d21a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.59]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 20f89cf6-6785-4640-03be-08d72617e76d
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3789;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3789:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB3789E56A87617060F058EFA5B5AA0@MN2PR11MB3789.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0136C1DDA4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(396003)(189003)(13464003)(199004)(3480700005)(76176011)(186003)(476003)(446003)(11346002)(8676002)(14454004)(81156014)(7696005)(81166006)(486006)(74316002)(53936002)(66946007)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(76116006)(66066001)(6506007)(53546011)(102836004)(7736002)(26005)(33656002)(229853002)(305945005)(6246003)(55016002)(6306002)(256004)(14444005)(2906002)(25786009)(86362001)(9686003)(3846002)(6116002)(52536014)(110136005)(5660300002)(966005)(8936002)(6436002)(478600001)(99286004)(71200400001)(71190400001)(296002)(316002)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3789; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: KSDr+E7ZPZL8prIk6rjM5SpTZc2bezeieMovVM+I1RAoi9KMIo8tcmFAH4Ne2eeeJZlMvgmhP6md0Gcl1ZEOTf7ojVfY5Kq55PIrup0t8+j9D77CaerV2u97549OXpZN+mGYHCeVVefIqIaAG172wbRBJIRjqA9icKOLWUGfh0+j9R3uAuBTpshQXj29BHGYkzQi7Kzg7d1ctVcxbD8Dvh6vSjYPfj25k4SzPDj0TF+0BAuR0iPiTtbQjolDCUQEIshpjHo0xisgbWnTd909SIT6UrTCjnASBdrN2eV0ab7STBeKP3gnyTE2fHKsvAJDjHgqtok1LTukPbiqclhkjCBtkMIQj/kVHsX8HhrLrCFncyFB6W9lKHNJ0sdKnXeS0LoWvOl2SFxVdFdw+owB3cYx3IoXRlLheNRd4hXd+9o=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 20f89cf6-6785-4640-03be-08d72617e76d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Aug 2019 09:14:00.3260 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: eHe4CFkLypklgxp2la50Xb5/JtYRNumDJzNk+GwHrRDk7bavaUc8/TR/MjTgiFbUv52hdGmzwPQQ8F39I5YF5Q==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3789
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.21, xch-rcd-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/lBv1dztfRmKaCdpD4aU3Uj8FCJw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] import from another SDO
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:14:12 -0000

Hi Tom,

I don't think that there is an issue here.  Copying Scott (as coordinator of IEEE YANG activities).

ieee802-dot1q-types.yang is developed as part of IEEE 802.1Qcp.  A copy of the published module is available at https://github.com/YangModels/yang/blob/master/standard/ieee/published/802.1/ieee802-dot1q-types.yang, and that references 
"IEEE Std 802.1Q-2018, Bridges and Bridged Networks."

I don't know if they have a registry for IEEE YANG modules.  But my understanding is that the update rules for IEEE developed YANG modules are the same as IETF, i.e. currently following the rules defined in RFC 7950 chapter 11.

draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang is progressing as https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model/.  It is in Netmod WG LC.

Thanks,
Rob


-----Original Message-----
From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of tom petch
Sent: 21 August 2019 09:53
To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>;
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>;
Subject: [netmod] import from another SDO

Looking at
              draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-09
I see that it imports ieee802-dot1q-types {
   prefix dot1q-type;
   reference
   "IEEE Std 802.1Q-2017: Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks.";

I have seen this before with
                 draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang
which I do not think progressed.

So, what are the implications, in terms of progress, of evolution, of the different approaches of IEEE and IETF?  Does the IEEE have the same ideas as us on registering modules, what updates are permissible and so on?

Any ideas?

Tom Petch

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod