Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for discussion
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Tue, 30 January 2018 10:25 UTC
Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074BD12DA73 for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:25:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=it-uc3m-es.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uizw6oSxCGCo for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:25:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com (mail-wr0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E31212DA51 for <NetSlices@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:25:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id a43so2950028wrc.4 for <NetSlices@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:25:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=it-uc3m-es.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9reTU3vnu+9S1nEqzwA3CjPew/9ewzVkegvvt61iKGI=; b=H9RWiWiHd9fl5jcrJSV2C8M04kVLY76uipfbmVH+w8Kkkhnjj1H/3r2GF1BTCO4Y9+ xP26+0VCU5fef5cd7Lq+XgwLVaRo4Rs4NcNxxZDaAirT5SMy3C61IXB6OwsDbmVoMr/y tvKfGsxUiWozquVjTm0QovAvTkLEh9I4RtWzuyB0DkG7tugYvi8YSNg6llFyNg+ClBx9 OTJK3plxotaPVqTd3jtgg3GXorwLNHcg38yNzG4QIGyzE8RsO6aqmg/MndKCFDPQPdcl +b81zudYyx4lqx6hfjBZ2UL3782RqrSGmkTwh7T6qHQh1dGxJzhcFIkgrkbrumc0GY5Z osQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date :in-reply-to:references:organization:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9reTU3vnu+9S1nEqzwA3CjPew/9ewzVkegvvt61iKGI=; b=K635zts2ULUzzZbhXY/snFnnYsT8FsoWy3iz58AcbeXZEPaUnX3Ovatj0uRJRQXECz QgNkgCmGIOyvNNDip2JES3JT1TQ+FpH3S1rsHpQm5pLsEC4VuEpTVgl717JjKHHZxiCZ BfYIeL2f8/2tzUhP1Rl5//PJW5zVDSTenmidS+jfo/Iymv/CCbLIXqorUCLCMdHUbkZP IdyLjiqdTByjo0nmejmc+DPR92ZWvCBq0s7VHQN074BZX4FXznH/2jU5wRAF5wvxvW/p 79ccMWck295ESpjxGrWaq11derBKv10qjQ+HJqkyF/OG91p/WNeNngjMP5hS4pyuzQCu EOTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfZ5jfAKZNA1TVgXOhhBcM13ppbdxSRPTXB9QKpoY6FitNRPHVo 7q6S2R9mechBsuAlCJynC/vhew==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x22672/gZyHeDYMdtXrJRU8HbheU65krmFNjIEjsDD8LY9YC1JTZLsmoSIq+H/YVz9qhEKZi49w==
X-Received: by 10.223.168.49 with SMTP id l46mr13700925wrc.29.1517307929601; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:25:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wifi-223-148.uc3m.es (wifi-223-148.uc3m.es. [163.117.223.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c24sm14991949wre.10.2018.01.30.02.25.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:25:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1517307927.3201.7.camel@it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
To: Pedro Martinez-Julia <pedro@nict.go.jp>, Xavier de Foy <x.defoy.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: NetSlices@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:25:27 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20180130043352.GB15400@spectre>
References: <CAHYjOTbKq5SGx2dUt5citBq=21dRYS4nK_Sebdq0nyPX9T7bLg@mail.gmail.com> <1517163726.4051.23.camel@it.uc3m.es> <CAHYjOTbgfBMywDYoG5oDEBMHORWvG_qoKJun8NawVsgDObFOsQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180130043352.GB15400@spectre>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.3-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netslices/Gh9xVdLcsqb4ywcZRYk_wtAx97U>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for discussion
X-BeenThere: netslices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <netslices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netslices/>
List-Post: <mailto:netslices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:25:55 -0000
Hi Pedro, Xavier, I like your proposal, thanks. I think now it is more clear. Thanks, Carlos On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 13:33 +0900, Pedro Martinez-Julia wrote: > Dear Xavier et al., > > I have rephrased the charter to make it more concise and clear: > > A network slice is a set of related infrastructure resources and > service > functions with qualities that respond to specific requirements, being > able to cross multiple domains and use heterogeneous technologies. > The > goal of this group is to produce and promote a technology-independent > and resource-centric management plane for network slices. Resources > associated with a network slice are normally comprised of physical > and > logical connections in access, aggregation and backbone networks as > well > as computing and storage elements. Service functions associated with > a > network slice include network functions and network function chains > pre-defined using corresponding network infrastructure elements. > > Please consider using this text or part of it. Thank you very much. > > Regards, > Pedro > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 01:50:24PM -0500, Xavier de Foy wrote: > > Thanks Carlos, do you think rewording the first paragraph like this > > helps? > > (Re-using text from other proponents) > > > > A network slice is a combination of infrastructure resources and > > service > > functions constructed according to customized requirements. Such a > > network > > slice may cross multiple domains using different infrastructure > > technologies. The goal of this group is to produce a technology- > > independent > > and resource-centric management plane for network slices. > > Infrastructure > > resources associated with a network slice are normally comprised of > > physical/logical connections in access, aggregation and backbone > > networks > > as well as computing and storage elements. Service functions > > associated > > with a network slice include network functions and network function > > chains > > pre-defined using corresponding network infrastructure elements. > > > > Regards, > > Xavier. > > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 1:22 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano < > > cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote: > > > > > Hi Xavier, > > > > > > One quick comment (apologies for being inactive, and for maybe > > > asking > > > about something you have already discussed) from a first read: > > > > > > I think the Conext part should start with a 2-line definition of > > > network slice. This should provide the context of is understood > > > as > > > network slice by the COMS WG. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > On Sat, 2018-01-27 at 12:51 -0500, Xavier de Foy wrote: > > > > Hi all, a group of COMS proponents prepared a preliminary > > > > charter > > > > text, taking into account recommendations collected when > > > > discussing > > > > the BoF request for IETF 100. > > > > > > > > The recommendations were for: > > > > 1. better account of the 4 key elements used in COMS: > > > > connectivity, > > > > compute, storage resources + network & service functions; > > > > 2. better description of the functional blocks and their > > > > positions in > > > > COMS; > > > > 3. better FCAPS coverage; > > > > 4. better coverage of the management of the data plane. > > > > > > > > Please share your comments on this list by Feb 1st. Other COMS > > > > proponents are also invited to provide additional information > > > > to help > > > > with the discussion. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Xavier, on behalf of COMS proponents. > > > > > > > > > > > > I. Context > > > > > > > > The Common Operations and Management on Network Slices (COMS) > > > > WG > > > > standardizes slice-level operations and management of the > > > > resources > > > > associated with a network slice. These resources include both > > > > network > > > > infrastructures and service functions. More specifically, > > > > network > > > > infrastructures are normally comprised of physical/logical > > > > connections in access, aggregation and backbone networks as > > > > well as > > > > computing and storage elements. Meantime, service functions > > > > include > > > > network functions and network function chains which are pre- > > > > defined > > > > using corresponding network infrastructure elements. Such > > > > resources > > > > may be parts of different domains enabled by different > > > > technologies. > > > > > > > > A "Network Slice" is realized using a collection of > > > > technologies > > > > spanning across data, control and management planes. Many of > > > > them > > > > rely on existing IETF technologies including both concluded and > > > > in- > > > > progress works such as: > > > > - Data plane: DetNet, TE-Tunnels, MPLS, Segment Routing VPNs, > > > > NVO3 > > > > etc. > > > > - Controller and/or control plane: ACTN, PCE and RSVP-TE > > > > (requiring > > > > LDP, BGP, OSPF awareness at level below) etc. > > > > - Management plane: YANG, OAM etc. > > > > > > > > The foundation of COMS is a technology-independent and > > > > resource- > > > > centric management plane. In reality, the network slice > > > > provider may > > > > have diverse technology choices in different domains due to > > > > geographical and commercial reasons. Therefore, COMS makes no > > > > assumption on which technology is used for specific domains. > > > > The goal > > > > of COMS is to define a common and inter-operative management > > > > mechanism, which is essential for the concept of network > > > > slicing > > > > being adopted in a system with heterogeneous network > > > > infrastructures > > > > and services functions. Major characteristics include: > > > > - Enabling composition of slices within a single or over > > > > multiple > > > > domains. > > > > - Allowing the operation and management of a network slice in a > > > > uniform manner, even when this network slice span multiple > > > > technology > > > > and/or administrative domains. > > > > - Enabling deployment of services over individual slices. > > > > > > > > II. Scope > > > > > > > > The WG will describe an overall architecture for network > > > > slicing. To > > > > manage network slices in a technology-independent manner, the > > > > network > > > > slice provider (NSP) will need to communicate with a network > > > > slice > > > > orchestrator (NSO) over a COMS Service Delivery Interface > > > > (SDI). The > > > > COMS SDI can also be used between network slice orchestrators, > > > > enabling hierarchical management through the notion of network > > > > slice > > > > subnets. Network slices will be leased to tenants, which will > > > > be able > > > > to use Customer Service Interface (CSI) exposed by the NS > > > > provider to > > > > run management tasks (e.g., on-demand measurement) within their > > > > slice > > > > instance under certain policies. > > > > > > > > The WG will describe an information model representing a > > > > network > > > > slice, accounting for the key elements used in network slices: > > > > connectivity, compute, storage resources, network and service > > > > functions — this information model includes the representation > > > > of > > > > managed objects and corresponding management and operations, > > > > will > > > > guide the design of data models on SDI and CSI and also will > > > > enable > > > > orchestrators interworking. > > > > > > > > The WG will specify requirements, operations and management > > > > functionalities on network slicing interfaces SDI and/or CSI > > > > including: > > > > 1 Network slice service profile, e.g. set by NSP over SDI, > > > > including > > > > high-level parameters for network infrastructures and service > > > > functions, together with their corresponding performance > > > > requirements. > > > > 2 Lifecycle management of network slice. > > > > 3 Other FCAPS functions. An important task of NSP is to > > > > aggregate > > > > faults, performance, status information and performance > > > > guarantees > > > > for certain services. > > > > 4 Slice composition or stitching in multi-domain environment. > > > > 5 Slice management by the tenant under the control of NSP, > > > > including > > > > deploying network services over a slice. > > > > > > > > The WG will specify requirements and functionalities of data > > > > plane > > > > entities as needed to enable the management of network slices. > > > > For > > > > example, this may include abstractions of policy control and > > > > enforcement, or gateway functionalities. The WG will also study > > > > the > > > > mapping between the abstract information model and managed > > > > entities, > > > > and will liaise with other IETF WGs as needed. However, the WG > > > > will > > > > not attempt to replicate data plane technologies including > > > > DetNet, > > > > TE-Tunnels, MPLS, Segment Routing VPNs, NVO3 etc. > > > > > > > > III. Deliverables > > > > > > > > WG deliverables are listed below and may be split in any number > > > > of > > > > documents as determined by the WG: > > > > - Problem statement and use cases for management of network > > > > slices. > > > > - Architecture of network slices. > > > > - Information model(s) and operations for network slices on > > > > topics > > > > described above in the scope section. > > > > - SDI and CSI interface specifications and relevant YANG > > > > models. > > > > - Study the mappings of technology independent network > > > > equipment > > > > configurations derived from the information model towards > > > > specific > > > > technologies and coordination with relevant WGs as needed. > > > > > > > > IV. Milestones > > > > > > > > Dec 2018 Problem Statement, use cases and architecture > > > > Dec 2018 Common information model and related YANG model > > > > June 2019 Network slices composition and interworking > > > > October 2019 FCAPS management functions and operations on > > > > network > > > > slices including abstractions of policy control > > > > and > > > > enforcement, or gateway functionalities. > > > > March 2020 SDI and CSI interface specifications and relevant > > > > YANG > > > > models > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Netslices mailing list > > > > Netslices@ietf.org > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices > > _______________________________________________ > > Netslices mailing list > > Netslices@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices > >
- [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for discussi… Xavier de Foy
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Alex Galis
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Xavier de Foy
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Pedro Martinez-Julia
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Shunsuke Homma
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Xavier de Foy
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Kiran.Makhijani
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Xavier de Foy
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… qiangli (D)
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Alex Galis
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Liang GENG
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Xavier de Foy
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Leeyoung
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Leeyoung
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Liang GENG
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Xavier de Foy
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Leeyoung
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Xavier de Foy
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Kiran.Makhijani
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Liang GENG
- Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for disc… Liang GENG