Re: [nfsv4] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning-09: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 26 May 2017 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD67C126CBF; Fri, 26 May 2017 14:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YDSp3q30hIr0; Fri, 26 May 2017 14:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFE66129515; Fri, 26 May 2017 14:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.29] (72-48-206-114.static.grandenetworks.net [72.48.206.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v4QL8c3E019146 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 26 May 2017 16:08:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 72-48-206-114.static.grandenetworks.net [72.48.206.114] claimed to be [192.168.1.29]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14F89)
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-dORuOL8nwgeyCFUfvVAV8=OE0EYgVz-Rov8CDgXWTg1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 16:08:36 -0500
Cc: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>, Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@gmail.com>, "nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org" <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <539543A3-FF87-4A4F-8398-FF8A913DD22F@nostrum.com>
References: <149557697648.28409.14675857846472715289.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CADaq8jfv8kUNnhvwka9a=f2nMEdsGQy_i-+t7RrVM8qEFR-vKA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-dORuOL8nwgeyCFUfvVAV8=OE0EYgVz-Rov8CDgXWTg1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/-aM4hr-Ms9M3EiyLapjugZMnpTw>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 21:08:46 -0000

> 
> On May 26, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> My inclination is to leave this draft as standards-track, but Ben's question was a good one, and if anyone feels strongly that it should be a BCP, please say something really soon.

For the record, I do not feel strongly about it.

Ben.