IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Thinking about an RFC5661bis.

Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com> Thu, 28 February 2019 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <loghyr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEA7129524 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:58:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Uw8ZfAeUR2y for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:58:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4364127AC2 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:58:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id bj4so10321694plb.7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:58:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sWMvtJQfXCSuY97RewClmrdM/o/olx/zXsObfZYuIXM=; b=gmREVCgGguceojcyuq6ZmnA5DGnLAnwaApfRBAaS6bnXqpXI8XKBww6Ppp96nVcgeM B9oOjYs1lpaWDtPyRnlhvqgNZncjHJ5Gp/0MpQZtCFRtipaiHvbTTXxiAfy/4/KCosjc tH8OSA9QTW0KAI0ucE4SrVM63Yj14FhfzDfE1zWPN/2mryIakrbMh8bCUyEzalLxSw3H Mww90aY+qLKRfgyOeIXra28WrB702j8CLQidNiiEX/aIsn5Zuk2IyhGuRriGiHXeZ9kX gfHmvDAKn3/aGsRy1BmO83UZAM4eTyVimdd1Fe4/5NNB76f2QjqSUqa09HsE0rn1ddUg bjlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=sWMvtJQfXCSuY97RewClmrdM/o/olx/zXsObfZYuIXM=; b=Ho/ydfgxFmY0p8iq8kvqdpd0Zw8F0eX1C+3v+ajGcp/1rEwDsq2MJ8gFF1s14fX/Nf GdmS+ML0hZk6J5D9jDdB+e4TNWYv0/cudKkdDLGa6EOWILcKssRuyZLBcFZC08RMKQ+V 1MMwBl2krIekJCcn3UTgFT/8n2C3DtK8Ga18OAqMLxVYRHSuLLGqcKRWxWaxCAXhTx2G Gqy/p4vGl14CAixB+omzQO0KM807j/ZlYvlrxVvMlKg+/YibVLbOyeEdW9Qgf3GrWOxh Y3V88yCVbxpH0lMvJbskAB8XPdplT6dcjjJpYakjxqlr0+Bs2qH74iQpbvcgfrHA/oRW OEyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWrffL/WLRe4RXitvzwM44g+kxjy8bq0F6zTMWtPCIud/v5avDn PjLBIzhrzEmX/Z+lZHbLo18=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjCjrtwgSPn4F/wpsH+OnRtBmMkhzY7le8BmmacOeC/rB4EyJaBNUYt+sBNnkN92Eo5pa6kw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b904:: with SMTP id bf4mr1360418plb.273.1551387520026; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:58:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from macbook-pro.lat.hammerspace.com (63-235-104-78.dia.static.qwest.net. [63.235.104.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p86sm47033856pfa.104.2019.02.28.12.58.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:58:39 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Tom Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADaq8jcpJAEXw_+UL-7v-EKZXeL8i-F9d2TDgiwjkHbUJpi=OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:58:37 -0800
Cc: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <86A0117E-D8F0-4FE1-BA4F-656CEC9545F9@gmail.com>
References: <CADaq8je5pzF7m+4oVCNfSeeBDQ98kBwAdCN_o1hBrfDob=SBaA@mail.gmail.com> <435DA055-E09A-4E0E-8E5D-49D5554DDAAC@gmail.com> <CADaq8jcpJAEXw_+UL-7v-EKZXeL8i-F9d2TDgiwjkHbUJpi=OQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/5KGOsHoh2pFriCjNcWh5HCI7o4Q>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Thinking about an RFC5661bis.
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 20:58:44 -0000


> On Feb 28, 2019, at 12:50 PM, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > While not volunteering, I do have a git repository for this work already started - last entry was 4-5 years ago. 
> 
> > I believe it also had some of the errata applied.
> 
> This could be helpful if there is an .xml file that could be diffed against the .xml for the existing RFC5661.   

Yes, there is...

orbie:5661bis loghyr$ git log --oneline 
56b2b56 Merge branch 'master' of github.com:loghyr/5661bis
facd52c Typo
98e73e5 Update instructions for getting xml2rfc
a54892e another typo fix: client vs server
a1c884f typo fix: notify_device_type4
2cf1b26 Get testx working
b4a0b2c Aargh, make the hurting stop... Got to work with newer xml2rfc
758d013 Typos
b28e561 Merge branch 'master' of github.com:loghyr/5661bis
e2402b0 Update address
cee7f7a Fix up NFS4ERR_DQUOT's value
8d7292e Merge branch 'master' of github.com:loghyr/5661bis
0fc3ee5 LOCKT can expire
9f736f7 Apply Asmita's errata
798cac6 Andy proposed some clarity on name lookup security
4ff393c Merge branch 'master' of github.com:loghyr/5661bis
710d3e8 Fix spaces in Makefile
c5ec1ac Fix ipr
f5028a8 Pull out xml2rfc as this is not the source control for it.
e578199 Marc Eshel\'s Errata 3226
91b2d4e Make idnit friendly
9078e8e Fix up xml2rfc
ef1ced3 Fix some formatting
62774b0 ERRATA: layoutget serialization
e364335 Small typos
8741ca6 Applied David Black's errata
e797eca Fix vspace issue
a8d2b06 Fix up testx
e302743 Tighten up the LAYOUTCOMMIT errata
6faa82b Fix typo
bc9a378 Added Implications of LAYOUTCOMMIT on file layouts
8964638 Take care of the errata
68ad4d6 More documentation on the documentation
bdd32f5 Archived original rfc5661.txt and the first official copy of the bis
a963a32 Start tracking changes
740a42b Fix Makefile copy error
284f6b5 Fix Makefile copy error
0b27cec Wrong Makefile
824c2c6 Create project, based off of fresh pull of RFC 5661

You can grab a copy here:

git clone git@github.com:loghyr/5661bis.git

Also, not sure that the XML for RFC5661 is available.

One of the things I have been doing is grabbing the last XML copy of a document before the editors are done. I.e., they make straight changes to the XML before publishing.


> 
> > And again, the reason why we never started is because it is a lot of work - both to edit and review.
> 
> Everything we do is work, but I don't think it is as much work as you think given the work already done in the documents published so far and soon to be published. 
> 


We said that exact same thing about RFC3530bis.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email