[nfsv4] Quebec and LAYOUT_COMMIT

Thomas Haynes <thomas@netapp.com> Thu, 09 June 2011 16:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Tom.Haynes@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B29E21F84B9 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dTObOi+wF7zd for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E208F21F84B3 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,342,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="554310386"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2011 09:09:42 -0700
Received: from sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com (sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.99.115.27]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id p59G9gPY029330 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtprsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.100.161.115]) by sacrsexc1-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:09:42 -0700
Received: from RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.100.161.111]) by rtprsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:09:37 -0400
Received: from linda1-lxp.hq.netapp.com ([10.55.74.231]) by RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:09:36 -0400
From: Thomas Haynes <thomas@netapp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:09:36 -0700
Message-Id: <5E5A9275-9ADF-42E7-B657-F0A5A4769B9E@netapp.com>
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2011 16:09:36.0929 (UTC) FILETIME=[A109E110:01CC26BF]
Subject: [nfsv4] Quebec and LAYOUT_COMMIT
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:09:43 -0000

Has anyone volunteered to present something on the LAYOUT_COMMIT issues
we are turning into a 5661 errata and a NFSv4.2 update?