Re: [nfsv4] Thinking about an RFC5661bis.

[Tom Haynes <[e-mail]>]

> On Mar 1, 2019, at 12:15 PM, David Noveck <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> >    https://github.com/loghyr/3530bis <https://github.com/loghyr/3530bis>
> 
> > and check that everything applicable there also makes it to 5661bis.  
> 
> The simplest way to do this is to start the bis document based on the 
> work that has already been done, as long as Tom is Ok with it being 
> used in that way.  We would still have to check the existing erratta list for
> things that did not make it into Tom's repo. 


Yes, the current bis document belongs to the WG and not me.

I started this document when I was doing RFC3530bis as a means to fix
issues I found in RFC5661 (and had to also resolve in RFC3530bis).
As I applied errata from either RFC3530 or RFC5661, I also applied
it to RFC5661bis.

I think I had also just gone through the effort to convert from the
format used for the files to the setup I used to track the chapters.

And when I determined never to do such a large BIS again, I probably
abandoned making changes to the git repo. In any event, I found
having the RFC5661bis to be useful for reference.

So feel free to base the changes off of it!