Re: Draft minutes for IETF Network Status Reports. - please comment.
Martin Lee Schoffstall <schoff@us.psi.com> Fri, 12 August 1994 20:21 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10332; 12 Aug 94 16:21 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10328; 12 Aug 94 16:21 EDT
Received: from merit.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16149; 12 Aug 94 16:21 EDT
Received: from psi.com (psi.com [192.67.6.2]) by merit.edu (8.6.8.1/merit-1.0) with SMTP id QAA26209; Fri, 12 Aug 1994 16:06:50 -0400
Received: from us.psi.com by psi.com (4.1/2.1-PSI/PSINet) id AA29799; Fri, 12 Aug 94 16:04:54 EDT
Received: by us.psi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.3-PSI-pop) id AA19788; Fri, 12 Aug 94 16:03:45 EDT
Message-Id: <9408122003.AA19788@us.psi.com>
To: Pushpendra Mohta <pushp@cerf.net>
Cc: Gene Hastings <hastings@psc.edu>, njm@merit.edu, nanog@merit.edu, Pushpendra Mohta <pushp@mystic.cerf.net>, fedor@us.psi.com, rick@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Draft minutes for IETF Network Status Reports. - please comment.
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Aug 1994 12:37:02 PDT." <199408121937.MAA21461@mystic.cerf.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 1994 16:03:38 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Martin Lee Schoffstall <schoff@us.psi.com>
In addition, PSI installed an SMDS switch in SantaClara several weeks ago which has a gigabit backplane. So, if there is a problem with CIX SMDS throughput there is a "net", using PtP T3's and mutliple SNI's on the CIX (PacBell) SMDS connection, remapped into another (PSI's) switch. Marty > > > > > > ================ > > > Random Bits: > > > > > > SWAB (SMDS Washington Area Backbone): In response to point of confusion, > > > it was stated that the SWAB bilateral agreement template is just a > > > sample, not a requirement > > > > > > CIX: The CIX router is getting a T3 SMDS connection into the PacBell > > > fabric. ALTERnet and PSI are doing so too. CERFnet currently is on. > > > > > > Noted in passing: Each SMDS access point can be used privately, to > > > support customers, to enhance backbone, etc.... This could have serious > > > implications for other provider agreements. > > > > > > CERFnet: Pushpendra Mohta (? --not at the meeting) is reported to be hap py, > > > but the group understood that most CERFnet CIRs are at 4Mbps over T3 > > > entrance facilities. PacBell was reportedly running two 2OOMbps (is > > > this the really correct, seems rather low?) backplane capacity switches > > > interconnected with single T3. Planning to increase provisioning -- > > > already have a lot of demand. > > > > > Pacbell operates two switched in the Bay Area. One in San Francisco > and one in Santa Clara. The former is practically full , and the > latter is brand new. All new T3 orders will end up on the Santa Clara > switch. It is true that the backplane of the switch is only > 200Mbps. > > Because the Santa Clara switch is new, the switches are interconnected > by only one T3 link. However, the switches are capable of more than > one T3 link and the product manager at Pacbell ( Dick Shimizu ) has > assured me that enough demand would warrant a new T3 between the > switches etc. > > > Providers thinking of buying T3 level services should specify the > Santa Clara switch although it should end up being used anyway. I have > alerted the Product manager and he will ensure that T3 circuits > are on the SC switch. > > A new switch is being planned for early next year, although enough > demand will accelerate that deployment as well > > > --pushpendra > > Pushpendra Mohta pushp@cerf.net +1 619 455 3908 > Director of Engineering pushp@sdsc.bitnet +1 800 876 2373 > CERFNet >
- Draft minutes for IETF Network Status Reports. - … Gene Hastings
- Re: Draft minutes for IETF Network Status Reports… Susan Hares
- Re: Draft minutes for IETF Network Status Reports… Pushpendra Mohta
- Re: Draft minutes for IETF Network Status Reports… Martin Lee Schoffstall
- Re: Draft minutes for IETF Network Status Reports… Curtis Villamizar