IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Mon, 31 July 2017 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E9213276B for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yACTMImUCM5b for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (psp3.ntp.org [185.140.48.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE7213277A for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (unknown [127.0.0.235]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39F986DB9D for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:36:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (fortinet.ntp.org [10.224.90.254]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD1586DAB4 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:36:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <job@instituut.net>) id 1dcFYV-000ImF-Tx for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 18:36:48 +0000
Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id m85so177788417wma.1 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BLiXY6p0jWmgHnjo4z0/IHqcla7Th3a4lTcKPvHVGsE=; b=EEeDS9STlEvAtZ8BNrSR41wjmmZb8eXLn9FxsVRw4FfvqwZuKfIo0mywQayWlNWeQg WXNvwhefpQffb6pHcsu55GRxv+IqUO24/tcDymdajynd5PEpIYMUgP2+RALndyvQqJlw Lo27znzhP/p0hCaGT8uFrdqDp0GWWMFWOpSIRFe4PfN3vxO58HkAAb8dlYyrDflV4/+s tpoFmiHea0y3ISUhRcNVKyNu+fqScBi5pBufbWrYrlI6VYiJG79NJAglj3wv69YGVPsM AP06cEZ/XmIVNnU9wgiWSKNaLO8KCjoSINh5rG5yF8+HUu3mvXqB7Sms5D7kdkUr6A2a Q8lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113FL+QEqNQLRAkLqHciqS46qDLpEH3FOvCDHas9BHNPm2eCsok6 uqUJsl55+B/h1rhK
X-Received: by 10.80.184.83 with SMTP id k19mr15261848ede.163.1501526198589; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:30cd:19b4:c56b:67f7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y55sm5949504edb.7.2017.07.31.11.36.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:36:36 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170731183636.dczoy4glknuw2dei@Vurt.local>
References: <707deca2-9037-c9fc-69bc-71ee80cb4c97@nwtime.org> <CAJm83bBjUU_PHhOcH4Sa7LdE2JEN3wojmXTWv_F_nnnRQz61Rw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJm83bBjUU_PHhOcH4Sa7LdE2JEN3wojmXTWv_F_nnnRQz61Rw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170714 (1.8.3)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.125.82.44
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: job@instituut.net
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] NTS: DTLS and symmetric mode
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.24
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: ntpwg <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:26:57PM -0400, Daniel Franke wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2017 1:47 PM, "Harlan Stenn" <stenn@nwtime.org> wrote:
> > Dave Mills recalls seeing a message where it was stated that DTLS is
> > great for client/server associations, but DTLS was not an
> > efficient/effective/whatever way to establish a symmetric
> > association.
> 
> I recall you asserting this in Prague but I haven't seen said message
> or > anything else which would substantiate this claim. Do you have
> details?

And how would it compare to QUIC?

If QUIC has been discussed before, I'd appreciate pointers to the
appropiate archive URLs.

Kind regards,

Job
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email