IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] [TICTOC] WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang

Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com> Mon, 18 September 2017 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBD613308C; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fNm1ByOe5uQr; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E3E124319; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id w94so16256801ioi.7; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DTrCQF0MnpE9Wz0VgSc73l4Gs2T1N9091cptQHQFm4s=; b=O2B1GiOP8QOXnmR9SeMBR7Rn6ND/PjPn4IdZS76g3o7kasVVD6zJYRad/nAw+xAqux hPN16MWYRrc7bz+kg8vJ4yJ2yJR+fhPd3lMxtvavsTiBFR1IzjLoKG0g4TIabfb2Y8N7 rQR2QTq4jGf1cT/yokwwW6IZgauvd/V7jUl+ZfAVwdsgY88SqxjQJYpGGelHj/Zeu1JE LdPh7WqKrVuSO+M290zibf6V3lgLYxZ+6hrVgORz7kOjWF2bGvqNcrQpt9c+xuhpfmfp Mg/E+rqlXyL0KQ5lzP2qzWjgcZz/1NM9nLC+tTipi86dP++fgmSeFqLRCZ4wZ7jZ0Pma jRAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DTrCQF0MnpE9Wz0VgSc73l4Gs2T1N9091cptQHQFm4s=; b=mU8xV1WuRFZwg1SCHmnbWkfTLe7Qwh4PIiycj5/butIw3OgoEc8qc2xvPHODVdt20r 0Qay5wRvZ0zJdyCsK9CwqRP6eNq4v5qTFvsv68Iba6fU8UWz+EbzA2Vd79MvcvVt0rZO NCJoI7W7GjlJ4Mc7eSt745EXM4CAhoYa8VSt23O/MRuvf0zoMWWqEEhVVWlI9KUQxdbH xFpMAPgVR2s4bsNSazHP/C3+42SPUuYbypmb3P+UdF0zmFGYnDxmLqk2Xs+nndc19bm4 XfMAcdOUKpo3tHQG4fJjyFwhSA0rSa1eM/1l8Vg5xPoTj9KNuh43DxG1BD747UKrfaLu hKIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiorUP3739jUcQiqe+bVptqYOmi7Tw23lYJ045z8sKmkP3uxYd6 DadIaQcej0d+qCd/jRqWL83i8VQpYVC8SyV0zyYg3Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCafkaEMMSmXhTTy4dNVuE1+5O9JDSZk/PQRLyKOkV/EpMrGCpwvQuSrJZFbyLlCdhb7qsLJHfq1xBthqYmjY4=
X-Received: by 10.202.10.1 with SMTP id 1mr34753145oik.221.1505717925148; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.168.181.200 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 23:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2D6594B3-2C10-4B65-B789-788A2DBF8E30@isoc.org>
References: <2D6594B3-2C10-4B65-B789-788A2DBF8E30@isoc.org>
From: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:58:44 +0300
Message-ID: <CABUE3XnPpisKkWiW2qBCJiO6Xjrb-bzer+Q_Kv=TfCdAcqXLGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Cc: "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113c58580f7a570559714645"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/DfdZDZjRbQleud5aPXl3mt4vCyQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [TICTOC] WGLC for draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 06:58:48 -0000

Hi,

I believe this draft is almost ready to proceed to the IESG.

Other than the YANG format issues that have already mentioned on the list,
I believe the Security Considerations section should be slightly extended.
- "Some data nodes defined in this YANG module are writable, and any
changes to them may adversely impact a synchronization network."
  Please elaborate about the consequences, i.e., what is the impact on the
network (Clock inaccuracy? Loss of synchronization? Other consequences?).
- The section should probably mention that the security considerations of
time protocols in general are discussed in [RFC 7384].

Cheers,
Tal.


On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
wrote:

> Folks,
>
> This message begins a 2 week working group last call (WGLC) for the
> following document:
>
> YANG Data Model for IEEE 1588v2
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang/
>
> Please review the referenced document and send any comments to the mailing
> list including your assessment of whether this document is mature enough to
> proceed to the IESG. Please note that these messages of support for
> progression to the mailing list are important and will be used to determine
> WG consensus to proceed.
>
> Please send all comments in by Thursday 28 September 2017.
>
> Thank you!
> Karen
> _______________________________________________
> TICTOC mailing list
> TICTOC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email