Re: [Ntp] Question regarding RFC 2030 for Time synchronization over SNTP and It's Accuracy

Martin Burnicki <martin.burnicki@meinberg.de> Thu, 13 June 2019 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.burnicki@meinberg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCBD120293 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=meinberg.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5bElaECGLeZ for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1a.meinberg.de (server1a.meinberg.de [176.9.44.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F69D120077 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv-kerioconnect.py.meinberg.de (unknown [193.158.22.2]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server1a.meinberg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C05671C067B; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:56:25 +0200 (CEST)
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 server1a.meinberg.de 7C05671C067B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=meinberg.de; s=mail201101; t=1560419802; bh=64RKpzdE0LMDQ9ptTPAvLwSMqJQ6V/sa99+830I7HQo=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Gus5Sb3edZSwKmoLOgCYJaSpzzytRJEM/NtC1nOLyC2NXDva5ARIvDhRpbaQEbAkY /lzBSZupkDpAAbjGMcs7L7hvW/UdvPgNjMYmefe7aCH+dflWaD6il7vvRLpn3eVq8z p73w2T7NEPEmMdblrHBDpIgn6P5pV83ZxCCL4G6U=
X-Kerio-Anti-Spam: Build: [Engines: 2.15.9.1244, Stamp: 3], Multi: [Enabled, t: (0.000005,0.007379)], BW: [Enabled, t: (0.000006)], RTDA: [Enabled, t: (0.475933), Hit: No, Details: v2.7.39; Id: 15.1i60qpr.1dd848k19.bmobq], total: 0(700)
X-Footer: bWVpbmJlcmcuZGU=
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by srv-kerioconnect.py.meinberg.de with ESMTPSA (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)); Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:56:22 +0200
To: Puneet Tambi <Puneetm.Tambi@adani.com>
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, Nitish Kumar <Nitishb.Kumar@adani.com>, Sumeet Sharma <Sumeet.Sharma@adani.com>, Uday Trivedi <Uday.Trivedi@adani.com>, Anoob Cherian Pulinthara <ANOOB.PULINTHARA@adani.com>
References: <7BB2735567D7CD40965CC5B4C192DFCBAFB29DDE@GHDCEXMB03.adani.com>
From: Martin Burnicki <martin.burnicki@meinberg.de>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=martin.burnicki@meinberg.de; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFUJbhwBEADpbjlFJrR+RWZSc5WFFmRVQUFQ+XwgRBrAtTkJyu+xhu6DvD6zq2IgnXQ3 W8pz/MoMMfKWaNOJ1qCxMfd8XrCR1WaO1m98Re9RqB9948ZH2VZIRN0MiLVVYLU0I0EufAUo y5P9TgyRet7Ojuy3j7LqOEjhYpIkkz1XNup2CjfNAN3xxrx8KJJ4iErtLL35X+UyNpHd57tx Y+OzOdBOfweHNyaj1vtY5cAQuzR66hom+gK0YyuXdGDeN5Gb1nvk8H9tj5Fd/VIm4nZdIxam n63Mdk8mQ7dO8f04B0XzhAxF0+B9uZqdC0twUuRvROuDC6eAjO3JganfXvCE6QKTb3rOM8l1 c8bTA/Pg3WF6y2Jnq4Rs4I1SiU9Oy5elr6pJJdhi7RY0b2Lj4l/7SaiwUCyMBX3Gm00sWOYF OU9fYa6cs/IvW9JQbeQu9Ph8QYczH51sNBpL7RfkjGybqZyU+HKs0EUe6nlpuIPL3MZ3QoKl G1M7PhV2BGkn3fzLHsDp1Nxuv1bbdfW4dkdyW/yLcu994VYSFrgDStt9g1Or0mkk+HeR0m3O 46w/FHw7ykvA8bp+2WMzJmyenj2/LN15l3CGewAbjjzgN9A1AOKlxGKcLOeTObxDMzj6qFWN O/g5GEsvYTe0qA3JEnNboJFJurBQJg7GBkAske0oJzTh9SgcTwARAQABzS5NYXJ0aW4gQnVy bmlja2kgPG1hcnRpbi5idXJuaWNraUBidXJuaWNraS5uZXQ+wsF7BBMBAgAlAhsvBgsJCAcD AgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAUCVg53sAIZAQAKCRDngzsH2I4xxZFMD/sE01cEvOva3nJW G9aUTmiKZJGfZHQ5I4JJUbixxPJxlV/U3oA7W9iEzH8Wn86HqZREEwKHLkFCWH6ij4riCyxV pq8i5xrq5nQm3ZEqfC2T7oi2FunOzGn6RDY7dK5x+o4OVaisWPFiT0fh23SvDsyxdjwHU81C eV+CDVwnhqjXjt+jwMOJ8Ix0aZ2CrOv5T029iaFwwYtF8s1HoXpYAgbataLFMZg7SCeJ8cmF F7XvSRbx9lWS2LQiKfwSoN0kU7s9cXz7lDNrSTdn7x0GiawrCGl6eknJ0/t2Qig3K3uRMxyU 0m1n7K2XuprLRBiobNqAQeyQlvf8Zw/CYbZ6DSoZnYB6WIz7xnp3fkXsxrxvaJabtGvzLX9R 5MjgtzFHEv5aAA8H66KsbM94L9sYI7aEjWe1RXN4VdDe5S4Y8GufYXtUmY20U81+XfVu3NUo v2iKl5Ynmp8DkFeYQ/P8vVve6fY8efctkyXtfV+WmkjGu0sTTYONnK+r10HxC0LxUo0Fg53v 6eK5uSwssPhE0guJ80qyasgAJg9zxkiJfg+px6YcTxsYgO9DQYdKEN5bX1eAfedXKAMLBIdq NwJIgGXT36Wd+GOVIGWDDIuhyHdzWp3RX69Qy8Ffdt9Jvg43D7TvQeEooigGxqfaq+g3wGOK P+QsVuCUcxaJQFSUCVrqOs7BTQRVCW4cARAA+fD7nDYh16eR+qE8ZRv2A+Oxv1OJxPdIJPwl yILGzwY1iQuG4IdEsFX2889aOiydmZRTvEcEcBu4hZ2o8IQlPF7Z8YAtb57RU71QDXU6P/v2 f851nDh6PWhx3SiaNbaluFenEv5l3gwn0oJrTJ3sfQqfcFi8ovlKGH35ZfZowo5lb5mg2B/P kWaZ84e23or7r6XxbilcY/2YSkf6w60wPVqUDnRMVNOsJPKzgpNhhMoxl0PeHRf/P5frx0YO q2rCxLF4OmlKQQeCNL/NiATxDe0zlmmsIdzujADlmmFD1cb/ioX0qDSU3duLaxmzt3lLj4K4 gOHEHUMoxbO5X3ANXa5WbbqeVRmG0NpV04xn0z9ZMNB02+/dHYzcd3FQdd0c41REDm//EzYm pmePcyYUVxzJTO1ZOe/Wm1jfCtNDqJUuaqsFgFIHWxfqC/lNTYpsRTFroF9qUc9GVGZiWc19 csMEiRUe1zF3ptR32/AtKn/ENRGG9wg64K/QL394zp+bi/3ZUrZXmhDhk2yT7nAGGP8OTZNW c9fPyLA2ZhDSdtGWaCXI0x+9BpWdxMJNK8KDSKlKkq9WS8pAh7fTKfm/ZgHksREn5EMgBlLD ZqLTnisi27pTpZdEdw056OYSlsS8wbGjskR4fSwSVf8poKkjg+xWiWJK3guULEHAqJc/8f0A EQEAAcLDfgQYAQIACQUCVQluHAIbLgIpCRDngzsH2I4xxcFdIAQZAQIABgUCVQluHAAKCRD+ 8+9OQlkOPUdcD/wPqaOmOEqbXR1vtiGYIwndveXaHOaJHQFZJ6dBGOoz1uz5AeJqCDWl/T60 w9rQ027JI2QNpc7FXc+9qzfKY0BmFcAKw8zB8Vd8fBWrFeg3VZ1SV/EiJqsc+6EVeXRuus0h v+UrpyXz4fhzhPGmNU8xyEZK9TTcHwLKWZyFgb+CUeKrJPZyckd4xsm0D3snaGIUe4itDsoi 2nXUehtJ5/QFInmgV3Xood7w1em9SQAc3pwYagDrWuTjjYni0fqWf2h/K3Q5nRjYc+Z/G/py WI/PqrMJ40gXUiI6o2xa2Hro+JVMb1O5Hv6fFmUPWNOJRuurg/0j8XYMLgAKg1sJua4/f8Ky jGYhJo82cXMHRvXEvMOnG8/vd42s4A1M96eOuxaVKZCdipTNWqIKQzkEVOixUPgie8sM/DPY 8TXhrsmRsWy9gb+pmszqmyvkTf4N1nP8yhS0wujtxxp6OHuzZs6EA2PB3t6CY4jFQ9Wx/YY8 A2abAhDb321Y79JhciNhBeBSTHivDnG3gsOy17LulRlkVN18vfTacxfQpJ0cafWExMmCE+o8 TMz85rQF8S7ftKIl9pJCcD6sZnxOTfkUa8C1NI93t+n4xe93wb+/8DiyVw8ZEa02RRYh/3ua +/2CDUvwR+qozbM4+1xb1skWYt81Vi7eLzGeZP2HscaieTYsKLgqD/sES5rNrNDKrItZKpP4 /r+c7F1zwCBxLyW2wcZyi5weEL8UaAu31HhoWT32y54m0ZyVrPVRwDXV8iHpCgMck26VLinj yFfi8WZsolS1lxLPOdD2B67sVNKXISJQk/Y2CN1CXA0vWLc0ENsaQyZAZjAbuo+TT37WjoXT nO8lOJJ5D9LhyjFjW0hYMFJq3eBAdxfGROyFOK9N29FU3hoU+tsYPSKrl3ws3PMg45cyRHLV Rip0xr0yXPYUYb70FnE70nVGICvMgUpmrM4XH1Yr7kt+5cBM583yuJ94rF/hOFHuR4GQWeFR xBSWd41qArjdABIxhZrnMICSW3fMyo9yfiQ6tXoyD1cHD/i2WmOnqCKEOtFScVeQJZJhqQb5 4NBx+viRax9d+X066AKYiBspm7kYwBVzNsng3uHOfyQXnVmcCEawxWIPyCtxSoV6fCKYdAfJ CQeElBXE89inkdGmdb0KLmYkHDoV4L1deAsPUI/t6qZjwqF3pKcr8kdGExqHwvytL8n1KGbY PyJ6Fn1z/idOOiTYgN+Q7FWRRX0QplyVpSBU4OnD0Gd3KkP+a0+kErokA1Lk3/YCE45VT8J8 8f4YGbRsIkf0xW+Ei0fk3fl9VPOrbTD+gFv+AzbT+Gp1+kElwVKj0VzXy0OC6UIQJ3J1on0l ArkcfPTIMcWxGmfGPw==
Organization: Meinberg Funkuhren, Bad Pyrmont, Germany
Message-ID: <74c23ff2-9934-d85e-cf21-f246f74ce21d@meinberg.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:56:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7BB2735567D7CD40965CC5B4C192DFCBAFB29DDE@GHDCEXMB03.adani.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at server1a
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/UThGd0SIb7QUM-MN5uORXY_MXJ0>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Question regarding RFC 2030 for Time synchronization over SNTP and It's Accuracy
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:56:49 -0000

Hello Puneet Tambi,

Puneet Tambi wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> We have some queries for betting understanding w.r..t. to RFC2030, as
> some of our IEC61850 device are designed to follow the RFC2030 for Time
> synchronisation over SNTP .

It is very important that you understand that the resulting accuracy at
the client side mostly depends on the *client* software, and the
network. Please see:
https://kb.meinbergglobal.com/kb/time_sync/time_synchronization_accuracy_with_ntp

Maybe you also want to have a look at this article:
https://kb.meinbergglobal.com/kb/time_sync/ntp/ntp_basics

> Q1.  How to interpret the poll interval from RFC 2030 and what is
> the***operative word for the polling interval w.r.t. defined in RFC 2030?*

Generally, "polling" means that the client sends a request to the
server, and receives and evaluates the response from the server.

The polling interval is the time interval from one polling to the next,
and how often this is done depends strongly on the stability of the
system clock at the client side.

> Poll Interval: This is an eight-bit signed integer indicating the
> maximum interval between successive messages, in seconds to the nearest
> power of two. The values that can appear in this field presently range
> from 4 (16 s) to 14 (16284 s); however, most applications use only the
> sub-range 6 (64 s) to 10 (1024 s).

Full featured NTP implementations like ntpd poll each server in certain
intervals and do quite some statistics on the replies, e.g. do some
filtering of the results to determine the network jitter, the client's
current time offset, and how the time offset evolves, i.e. how fast the
client's clock drifts.

The polling interval is then usually adjusted between certain limits,
depending on the stability of the client's clock. For ntpd the default
limit are 2^6 s to 2^10, i.e. 64 to 1024 s.

> Q2. Can Poll interval be set as completely arbitrary value  if yes the
> what shall be the minimum value  set ?

If you run your own NTP server you can generally use any interval you
want. If you use public servers you should not use an interval less than
64. Doing so is usually considered abusive by the server operators.

And you should *never* use a hard-coded IP address or host name of a
public server. That would be considered a denial-of-service attack.

> Q3. What can be the impact/difference in time stamping of events from
> the same inputs on 2 different SNTP clients (A & B) having the different
> poll interval (e.g. A having 10s and B having 64s) in a same network ?
> 
> Q4. How the different poll interval can affect the time accuracy of two
> devices in similar network?

As said above, this depends strongly on your network and the
implementation of the client software.

Writing an NTP client software is *not* just sending NTP packets to a
server, and evaluating the response. If you want to have the client time
adjusted as accurately as possible you have to do a lot of filtering,
implementing a control loop to discipline the system time, etc., in your
client implementation.

Or just use one of the existing full-featured clients.


By the way, a better forum to discuss this could be the NTP questions
mailing list:
https://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions

This mailing list is dedicated to discussion standards used for future
versions of the NTP protocol.


Regards,

Martin
-- 
Martin Burnicki

Senior Software Engineer

MEINBERG Funkuhren GmbH & Co. KG
Email: martin.burnicki@meinberg.de
Phone: +49 5281 9309-414
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/martinburnicki/

Lange Wand 9, 31812 Bad Pyrmont, Germany
Amtsgericht Hannover 17HRA 100322
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors: Günter Meinberg, Werner Meinberg,
Andre Hartmann, Heiko Gerstung
Websites: https://www.meinberg.de  https://www.meinbergglobal.com
Training: https://www.meinberg.academy