Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-15.txt

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Sat, 19 January 2019 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF8F128B14 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:13:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OAVeqBWqV02M for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:13:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F951271FF for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:13:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id l12so18489429qtf.8 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:13:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bKYEm9u8NFa5SvFXgClfE4LfQEzT6PM5Jar0eS2Mku8=; b=NfpwkH67QLYanykjFICOOOGTSrGTgksRb+IVJHsOZNpknzASVcqmAh/6uLcG20gQoU RPg/QmLoosl/ilg9BzoK5caWhAneQu7wn47hfcsp8uVwFTx9sZtNUdQnovifB9ywibcD +UDsuoL80cQvq+q1qp0iPup0aGXNmPS2jrXegYv0apUSgAtQQo09yOpoTKeia62QhQx+ Ngtic7o0qSuZlzI1haB8XtWSoRCSw7f59w3ID5FVYTCMbRciHexY2+Ks/0BzugerntUk 6oVj5hbxohu0SEy7/g/X9QXs9esTNb9OdY3A4JW+kpOoLRoufyfBNnmyFA9YdkOdze8y kicA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bKYEm9u8NFa5SvFXgClfE4LfQEzT6PM5Jar0eS2Mku8=; b=czdKm8wz94+knjcOSWTx6+JpvU1EwUOeLSXvrVJ3oD7xY4aBQucSd1N3VH6iKY5dV2 xsxx7ENMwxyB1GrrqPN8RFy8efZJvKk8NjcIX4uqa38HCwzQfEKIkocdxqWWA3VyZimi ApYcLtPokUfKZB33mNqscYmH8NcQUOqe73F8MewmTZ8+CjowwHQ1+ti0izJ/RLrLv83M vbgttI0ZLTc0waivyk4S03mA1YlA30bZXdJkna0YWE88t6eu/o/u9uA4e2EeFALTzASl 22E+/Km9VMWJ2nR+YG+BzcnXoiduXd6Sn+giqur+WvcpdHT4r+k1cNojdcHZcjVBL/he zuww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdjcF1pzga7BIGdw2Uj/1k7vcpsD+WK8Bf7wMrTIJMeLeU4i/c0 jNhLhY5fTzfL/CKNTupLu3ucTVAK87ncKTTLeMA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4BKXxbj8Wf9UbMiGGyiLib22fBRWBZGCgeRT5Rfuvtm+NdXAh54dTVJemiXnCgQ9+Y9zH8M2BhFBdOamxclm4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3181:: with SMTP id h1mr20606359qte.14.1547910809652; Sat, 19 Jan 2019 07:13:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154503483197.18595.650186186582826104@ietfa.amsl.com> <20190119112250.BD7EB40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
In-Reply-To: <20190119112250.BD7EB40605C@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:13:18 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJm83bAmnxk7ZmmijjDCTEYuUBtjppqhHUrYo2okjQctsd8n4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Cc: ntp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/lV74s2I97P8ncJdjsIKvlcAgEG0>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-15.txt
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:13:33 -0000

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 6:23 AM Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> Is that number so large for the algorithms we will use that we don't have to
> consider it?  Assume the client is sending 1 packet per second...  If the
> answer is over 100 years, I'm happy.

The recommendation for AES-SIV is to encrypt no more than 2**48
messages under the same key. At one message per second that's almost 9
million years. If you (unwisely) use AES-GCM instead, where the
recommended limit is 2**32 messages, that's still 136 years.