[OAUTH-WG] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 16 February 2017 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietf.org
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C621F129482; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 02:31:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.43.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148724107880.15846.17288887741708916676.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 02:31:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/-bE53B8V0LP1XqEWPXJW5DcVqDQ>
Cc: oauth@ietf.org, oauth-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_dra?= =?utf-8?q?ft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:31:19 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Two minor questions:
- Should this document maybe update rfc6749?
- Should this be like this?
OLD
""request" and "request_uri" parameters MUST NOT be included in Request
Objects."
NEW
""request" and "request_uri" parameters MUST NOT be both included in 
Request Objects."