[OAUTH-WG] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12: (with COMMENT)
"Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Thu, 16 February 2017 10:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietf.org
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C621F129482; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 02:31:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.43.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148724107880.15846.17288887741708916676.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 02:31:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/-bE53B8V0LP1XqEWPXJW5DcVqDQ>
Cc: oauth@ietf.org, oauth-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:31:19 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Two minor questions: - Should this document maybe update rfc6749? - Should this be like this? OLD ""request" and "request_uri" parameters MUST NOT be included in Request Objects." NEW ""request" and "request_uri" parameters MUST NOT be both included in Request Objects."
- [OAUTH-WG] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on … Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on … Mirja Kühlewind