Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-06

Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@MIT.EDU> Wed, 09 June 2010 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <hardjono@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630883A6879 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.186, BAYES_20=-0.74, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29sAdZWMktwW for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:30:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.25.12]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9FC3A6837 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190c-b7bd2ae000005d05-44-4c0f977c4c92
Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (MAILHUB-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.21.35]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-1.mit.edu (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 82.62.23813.C779F0C4; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:30:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-2.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.16]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id o59DUaE3002885; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:30:36 -0400
Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) ) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id o59DUYKp031923; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:30:35 -0400
Received: from oc11exhub5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.15) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.393.1; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:30:04 -0400
Received: from EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu ([18.9.4.15]) by oc11exhub5.exchange.mit.edu ([18.9.3.15]) with mapi; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:30:35 -0400
From: Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@MIT.EDU>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:30:33 -0400
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-06
Thread-Index: AcsHo7bRM8rhlrHeSOiOcYim1/yYSQAM740g
Message-ID: <DADD7EAD88AB484D8CCC328D40214CCD01792590A7@EXPO10.exchange.mit.edu>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3EAF6E95@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3EAF6E95@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-06
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:30:37 -0000

Is there a diff version of this draft (eg. a marked PDF say)?

ps. I know the IETF doesn't do PDFs, but I thought I'd ask anyways :)

/thomas/


__________________________________________


> -----Original Message-----
> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 3:17 AM
> To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-06
> 
> (Should show up any minute.)
> 
> This is mostly pre-meeting feedback, plus some big removals of signatures and
> discovery.
> 
>    o  Editorial changes, corrections, clarifications, etc.
>    o  Removed conformance section.
>    o  Moved authors section to contributors appendix.
>    o  Added section on native applications.
>    o  Changed error response to use the requested format.  Added support for
> HTTP "Accept" header.
>    o  Flipped the order of the web server and user-agent flows.
>    o  Renamed assertion flow "format" parameter name to "assertion_format" to
> resolve conflict.
>    o  Removed the term identifier from token definitions.  Added a
> cryptographic token definition.
>    o  Added figure titles.
>    o  Added server response 401 when client tried to authenticate using
> multiple credentials.
>    o  Clarified support for TLS alternatives, and added requirement for TLS
> 1.2 support for token endpoint.
>    o  Removed all signature and cryptography.
>    o  Removed all discovery.
>    o  Updated HTML4 reference.
> 
> There is going to be another draft this week so if you are very busy, just
> wait.
> 
> EHL
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth