[OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Metadata: IPR Confirmation
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 07 March 2017 17:51 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088ED129467 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:51:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DPRj7ARGNmrh for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B181612954B for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:50:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.91.177] ([80.92.114.23]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSdRI-1csuTZ3LTY-00RbhC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:50:54 +0100
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <4602a58b-58c1-d41e-26cb-025eec8a6d8b@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:50:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gwlftHm2d6H53jOkCX8oh02F98OSkBIkH"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Emp7J5mBi2bwHLLvQIFubb5XoO246nDrL/7zQ7qCG+DPAa74E20 Q2rlJqSgj37k0GggqvhSGbqRjLJ5NBUz/vVMfwEOjXR+E+tNX0jM5TXWwWS/DUb5dWtyT1l 4dg3/nQEiaC1vsBuhbS9a0jsMQkk4SPa16HOJHtYLTEfgoMBeCbvFikzqq7FqXkSU2QjAKp u/nEVj3yp79OWqBzxAfTw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:PjoXhcuWg2k=:ijbBJQrUNFiYrqfqBOg0j6 pZJd7I7wxBPgdfm7HLniG3nGxHPgya76hJIJdBGnvJFuSK9SHjyj1/rUXCEYrLMHb7obgwzNF SjfRrdZRXNIk8OWOlgQGN0mFMFAICVu1Q+KeF56vRsJnbx7LqlXU7vR8q6GzVUr0RLKEJVPFp SMFEDA4bMplbFc+wxRM5xs5/QX2RqmZ5v8MSuPl5C7bAaRSBaXoJX6UE48lx5zsr5LaoV7rFr g4RMiG3UcvNUwQ6gs6h69l+vAHr/S9miE6r94cDNe/PiIrbCF8/H88T5cT5uF5+mG1QS6AaGT rcGMh/x5Tf+g2cvUQXcs9qsl3cN7Sv8AgU00Bkh8Y0nES7a1tBj1bx7QA2+5B8pLbms5nLGg+ SjmwX3oqC0apMI5W7LZK2riXn661uF9V2pGbQ84FELbWpQ+HBxTvmnsrxFunELCsJGy+ylAV3 56hT9YGGMv4oSlNzV2qckFboGfBVD3wEfQeHcEAFAjvw3NMHHqJtwtI14/WPF9QX5uxCvpyZu X25ektT599T8Gs4LvykNAG6kiTJ+SDx2L1fcTLtuTfr/4J0xBKyMC+Iztj8c0ROnzP8aIbMwZ l39wrU4W/IyWtBZ7fi3PDMDtag78Gabkn9yD+vw6fEM2h9CPprcPDRghRRLpY11BsjBpKD4iW 7JGVq0qofTUuedwMGCeKfAk6/4GSIw0XrDYHHWNL288wpyW2KT41dlrppjydyzK5TGxnNHTx4 gQ9KZt0R4Ql1pnvJ4V20Pr3Sxc18pirrQne+aZTqqT166SD85zRDw98D3pk=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/moyiZ_9yNnIVZvf3Gyo9c9Muozo>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Metadata: IPR Confirmation
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:51:28 -0000
Hi John, Mike, Nat, I am working on the shepherd writeup for the "OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Metadata" document: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-05 One item in the template requires me to indicate whether each document author has confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. Could you please confirm? Ciao Hannes
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Metadat… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Met… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Met… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server Met… Nat Sakimura