[OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile-00.txt

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sat, 20 October 2018 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7D812D4EC for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 06:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vAJNuq-YknPL for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 06:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0088512D7EA for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 06:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14336; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540043417; x=1541253017; h=references:subject:to:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=gWXQ0DafusxZal7yYqfqIa18IeCnrRkoy18ezLl6cI8=; b=CKWOU/8F0dN0AwgJSklFf4BYf//pAz7AeTolTIUY3L5TGwXc3ATQnPop vMXRAZPUFIE+811AoXZZiFUQ50Td+E7miT3wa4IdWitUpgo1GeXh+Lddq B1GPQhu/YTSEJaL3fitraBoNEUSrWzuX6FArx01R+1TEcmEA0MHkb36LU 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AUAAAZMstb/xbLJq1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBVAIBAQEBCwGCan8og3WId58Wh0IIBSWERwKFKTcKDQEDAQECAQECbRwBC4U7AwMjVBIPAT0CAk0KBg0IAQGDHQGCAQ+lcYEuH4QRAgxAhQ8Pgm2IfIIAgTiCa4MbAQECAQGEYII1IgKJAoVIQoU7igEJhA+BbmWKCgYXgVJMhCeCboZ7jFiKBYFZIoFVMxoIGxUaIYJsCYsQhUA9MAGLagEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,404,1534809600"; d="asc'?eml'208?scan'208,208,217";a="7332211"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Oct 2018 13:50:14 +0000
Received: from [10.61.201.80] ([10.61.201.80]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w9KDoDfw010506 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 13:50:14 GMT
References: <154004309927.13721.13477714795416644370.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=lear@cisco.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNJUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAb2Zjb3Vyc2VpbXJpZ2h0LmNvbT7CwJEEEwECADsCGwMC HgECF4ACGQEWIQSY0L2QRh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgID AQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6MyMyCACXvtFjAYGMtOkD9MD4nI3ifFpkrj8xTMbXjrv5hdqmzRmQ0wqA 1U/OlZux+P/NaVMiZNZc8zw0nsx/INAqDOVd4/tLWF+ywTkeRFR0VnaUxLwCReZAZOaRS+md +52u/6ddoFja2RnjZ43qbbuvVUARQVIyMJz+GbR6mEZQHR0psD7dDYZDyrpivCxm8zHQwmB6 AZUlO7OJgljDvVPVDCabg/ZnJw1qS0OzSiNb0MySk1D5A7FdwDgeKxuMYUOOoVVTTMWNWcME UkRX9LxElswEt0PQWiz/j3FYXTxiFfl/1vKcHx4pM+E5C5mhTbrdFUFLJC3Y5fLID7stK/Ch aEaBzsBNBFMe1UQBCAC0WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Ma cj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGoHOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U 7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExddqV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcY Y/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5cHUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU +tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypucGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5 ABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c6 2pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHSiXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnX HXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGwf2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycj PAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoAMjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPF OmDhJSmH55HLAky2MlmqJYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt 2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNRzGbgqoT1Di03RQ==
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <154004309927.13721.13477714795416644370.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <8a5f971d-ae43-b93d-fab8-f92a9d203b02@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 15:50:12 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <154004309927.13721.13477714795416644370.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MJRxr22e9nhewUI97ROkX8UiQ77926aUH"
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.201.80, [10.61.201.80]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/5Um9uPr6pFQO7ZmZUSSSoNCHS7c>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile-00.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 13:50:20 -0000

This is a little ditty that Jerome Henry and I have started in response
to some requests that we have some ability to profile bandwidth usage in
a MUD file.  This is a very brief draft.  I would appreciate if I could
have 10 minutes to talk about it.  There are a few questions that I
would like to ask the room.

Specifically:

 1. In profiling bandwidth, would you like in the model (a) an aggregate
    statement of how bandwidth is supposed to be used, (b) a fine grain
    view by port/service, or (c) both?
 2. Does the draft have the right units in there?  Right now I list both
    packets per second and bits per second with a configurable time period.
 3. Is this something you would be interested in reviewing, pursuing,
    editing, etc.'ing?

Thanks!

Eliot

--- Begin Message ---
A new version of I-D, draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Eliot Lear and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile
Revision:	00
Title:		Network QoS Expectations Extensions for MUD
Document date:	2018-10-20
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		9
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile-00
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile


Abstract:
   Manufacturer Usage Descriptions (MUD) are a means by which devices
   can establish expectations about how they are intended to behave, and
   how the network should treat them.  Earlier work focused on access
   control.  This draft specifies a means by which manufacturers can
   express to deployments what form of bandwidth profile devices are
   expected to have with respect to specific services.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat


--- End Message ---