Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02

Support for adopting this work.

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 3:32 PM li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Support adopting this doc as an operator with the following comments.
>
> We are considering corelating VPN services with tunnels (SR MPLS TE tunnels or SRv6 TE tunnels) and SR policies to provide specific SLA  to our VPN coustomers. So please consider to add those augmentations in the VPN service. And I'd like to complete this work if we all determine those are necessary.
>

See draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang which does the mapping for
L3SM. Would be good to think how the grouping can be applied to L3NM
as well.

Thanks!
Dhruv

> Best Regards,
> Zhenqiang Li
> ________________________________
> li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
>
>
> From: Tianran Zhou
> Date: 2019-09-29 14:28
> To: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a 2 weeks working group adoption call for draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-02.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-aguado-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm/
>
> This document proposes a L3VPN Network Yang Model (L3NM) to facilitate communication between a service orchestrator and a network controller/orchestrator.
>
> If you support adopting this document please say so, and please give an indication of why you think it is important. Also please say if you will be willing to review and help the draft.
> If you do not support adopting this document as a starting point for work on this topic, please say why.
> This poll will run until Oct 14.
>
> Thanks,
> Tianran and Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg