[OPSAWG] The future of MUD work
John Schiel <jschiel@flowtools.net> Wed, 14 August 2019 18:47 UTC
Return-Path: <jschiel@flowtools.net>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8400E120D94 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=flowtools-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jB8P7J_Xn85X for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F40120D8D for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id x19so120597eda.12 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=flowtools-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=a3qXl9Lgdyt3VXnuybUtih4WJy4x3g/NG52/BGDIo3k=; b=ToYgEVacVuWgMXkekIW0F17gcVOmDXHQTNdnx7Q3KcqXWRDcxFvz/Wf1kA2O23vtLq gE9+GnHtWL8MYI3hJ6uz26BvkKAcTdSDkctCpILyLsvLL85yvVB+sQ3S0x6QvUbCCnkT zF4YNLSmU9ax4W/kXVaJA4KhFldCGj8ZCR2YBZatxO66o/sGjJl7uTtk+jamJTbdhsFR 9IadgHXkSDNbAmGZvfZlgGTUkqWIG6awSzfe4LCYyJgfNhRkVLOvqCI101nZwDp8TT1R FSwx3tKmgchs+ghxnbQApoIK4uzPU8h/PtWcPWZBBL0zzjp5pm52raZWycd2kKIeVLxr ty9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=a3qXl9Lgdyt3VXnuybUtih4WJy4x3g/NG52/BGDIo3k=; b=C9fcSAaJY9ls9rOLWdQdwXWIXzKmJpal4JrVjYUVUjk2q2YLDxB0nhe7RkJz6txyqu BkhCw6YmFaNvVTtrTYeNtP/Ul2Sr8CoDdfvtw5EbWUaELH4NBaSrFh7UawO9saLTg9rA ljhxD2Y/FOF6kYir0Q+8EOChjkBaP2CbhyXQ8yXM2QFJBDbqGuN90gNQc4xFk5xojheK YLF3yeQHnPq1XXRqrkdvJq8Z3fDZ68yKedEN0kY6zsdQCGlfM15FsqSQKD76jIiS8F3J zClvh8QBVa6gImHIAroM6zTRx/4GvyeyD+LQsIsPYhWgy0SZhVjk41gttaf7zDWRiZ/G L7iA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVcIWXn+M0cXwzVG6VS96oxqr7GfALJNWaqvfyQ/lTx4J4pglhO jssGDlDEjZqRn07mGbBRTUiEcwl7JViumea2SBQpQox3
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKWVZBh45qFI8woCz3XEPZYSpKzIRLatLgomgA29cGSi2GypZ8WgV+SluoWMKIAUGWB/fVMRJPyVQDAmuqXdk=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:ba8c:: with SMTP id x12mr1287870ede.70.1565808435174; Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: John Schiel <jschiel@flowtools.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:47:04 -0600
Message-ID: <CABmZaCOCmoLm3rfZ0QJ64i-+bDCJgY5fRvPPQT0j_ho9hsgipQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000090b2870590182f15"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/KZTGpiemyjVYiBudciHUbSdQ3DA>
Subject: [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:47:19 -0000
Just joined the WG mailing list today, Joe Clark made mention of a current "mud@" mailing list on August 2nd. Where is that "mud@" mailing list? Thanks, --John
- [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work John Schiel
- Re: [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work Michael Richardson
- Re: [OPSAWG] The future of MUD work John Schiel
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Mud] The future of MUD work Qin Wu