IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 25 September 2018 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2059130FB4; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 09:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=zqmQRU59; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=nwULJbIq
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k3Lodvk19d76; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 09:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B1D1130E89; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 09:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA86821F39; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:57:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:57:05 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=CzPTo3WWCmfFROXuL93EDUFUzYKrF NNzxcIOfM++Gug=; b=zqmQRU59c28ZYX1siMA0Oc8ET+ik9fh3O/6hyw6pXuxP6 yQf9gz4nNp1w2zOjXd+8P9jUPUTJUQ7I7OeaduWoeETvGj4wTPFpjZuohn/VmmEN CIYtjSaxmv13gTPO5FuTQ3GSa22ZtsGXb6rSeCsPi+2IsGQjBIi034izQlx/Mnco Dkh/Zr7J+3f5VBC9eHCDbA1MTJrHdvtnSi4DyvgW74GA8NyZOuPbBTil+yLYhjzI prrh0INevUtdslxJK3CxnclolTcUtTbPT1Tsw/6HpA3DKdbuh8jTYaEX/O7mXTMi okp53K9Evr0XzrCuhP0l3GpHdNW7oZIHkc0SCaiQw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=CzPTo3 WWCmfFROXuL93EDUFUzYKrFNNzxcIOfM++Gug=; b=nwULJbIqJPYAFwVcsQwHl0 nFAuA2cLgt16J6Hah8mfXPrNbWSHqv2bNoc0D5xP2XB/WKLkClGM4odqfJGJbNIg r91oiUoxKeLeIom39dUecVoB/5hfJfsn1mcqBrJjBRZHsRN7EUK8OB14cJoeWe9D TZcgIom0Zmx5zv+Y1Zmk5ilLMUCkb7CniTNirn/POE2TjLL2zJi/G/EeD9tDVlB2 LCaOz03awKGhfxgV4jjJadK5CG3O+/MPpTXK6oDIsYCW/aj3d/Q/BBNWXHTc759A MCjwurWooTsfVtHRAkaxTFNsxdxFzxWbpoItEOrJugVjo7KnhOGVpfsuQuCxVo6Q ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4WiqW20vqXsb-7WkJA7gGzzhssspFqcm0Q8iptJq2aaJ8XLlpKu9KA> <xmx:4WiqWyujbGJbWAu_kHx9r5xBT3hOz89Ix1AP7k7SFBASPoqAoPvlUA> <xmx:4WiqWyWD42Q8vsn2CsPFjTK0u6H75xULTgve3ZtQLCQBtRFFZgKqLQ> <xmx:4WiqW-v01cYbd4_aU7j24EbglxYD_UjKbbk0jl-e9sGMxw3PDvtsCA> <xmx:4WiqW0PInnB_gV2iNkuWM1CtfczMDste7Hy7wrVBI3i-CRyc-Qvt5g> <xmx:4WiqW_UVECVHA6pOtOBKzi20KnBpzZy_gD4UnP3iZBQMU_KgczWWKg>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:4WiqW7paNV5eVzKM2irCZqCU-BVfCtFbLC7qK9OFHI7mBq8RltkONg>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.65]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9BF6BE4179; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:57:04 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF467D9@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:57:02 -0400
Cc: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang.all@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8BF9E7A6-D05F-44C3-BF90-C6AB1025CA0E@cooperw.in>
References: <152921687734.2071.3843497811933571200@ietfa.amsl.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF467D9@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/L1nqiNd0IFjxpvbtQ-8EPqfNpHI>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 16:57:17 -0000

Roni, thanks for your reviews of this document. I have entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Jun 18, 2018, at 3:52 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Roni, 
> 
> Thank you for double checking. 
> 
> As per your comment: 
>> I was just wondering why it went from  version -10 to -14
> 
> I confirm that the changes since -10 are very minor (mainly fixing some nits). The version bump was a side effect of addressing the OPS directorate review which raised a point related to the NPTv6 part in the module (NPTv6 is defined as Experimental while this draft targets Standards tracks): https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/-kQoJuw7J7d97GaqAoNwjJoKDW8. NPTv6 was reintegrated based on the comment made by B. Claise: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/bXXmrr9VeWXuDBZ-ebyPRSqCHgI 
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com]
>> Envoyé : dimanche 17 juin 2018 08:28
>> À : gen-art@ietf.org
>> Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang.all@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
>> Objet : Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14
>> 
>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>> Review result: Ready
>> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>> like any other last call comments.
>> 
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>> 
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-??
>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>> Review Date: 2018-06-16
>> IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-28
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>> 
>> Summary:
>> The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.
>> I was just wondering why it went from  version -10 to -14
>> 
>> Major issues:
>> 
>> Minor issues:
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email