Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network functions?
Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> Tue, 11 December 2018 16:12 UTC
Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFD4130E1D; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:12:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R0wnMgXYnfLk; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0EB1124C04; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1393FCFAB13A1; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:12:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:12:14 +0000
Received: from lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) by lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:12:15 +0000
Received: from SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.39) by lhreml709-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.58) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:12:14 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.185]) by SJCEML703-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.67]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:12:11 -0800
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model@ietf.org" <draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model@ietf.org>
CC: "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network functions?
Thread-Index: AQHUkUO+ttdu7Btv+EWRQt1tMCs7+qV5sE7Q
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:12:10 +0000
Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B20E18F@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B1F609F@SJCEML521-MBB.china.huawei.com> <039901d49143$5d6dcba0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <039901d49143$5d6dcba0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.103]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/wf3JEjYZi3vccl73kws4VzDKE7M>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network functions?
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:12:20 -0000
Tom, Thank you very much for the review and comments. So there is no duplicated work in OpsArea? Authors of the draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model: Can you please update the draft per Tom's comments. Linda. -----Original Message----- From: tom petch [mailto:ietfc@btconnect.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:22 AM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network functions? Linda I looked at the draft and think that it needs some work before it is a YANG module:-) - NMDA conformance is not mentioned - the reference to RFC2119 is out of date - the format for tree diagrams is now specified in RFC8340 - YANG import statements lack 'reference' as in import ietf-inet-types { prefix "inet"; reference "RFC 6991 - Common YANG Data Types"; - YANG module has no copyright - YANG module has (almost) no reference statements to tell the user (like me) whereto go to understand it. look, for example, at draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang for a module that is well supplied with reference statements - YANG module should reference the RFC from which it comes - the one and only reference in the YANG module is reference "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07"; but the I-D is draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06 I do not understand - where you reference an I-D, it needs a Note to the RFC Editor e.g. reference "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07"; becomes reference RFC YYYY "....." -- Note to RFC Editor please replace YYYY with the number assigned to "draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring" - IANA Considerations must be present - Security Considerations must include the YANG template HTH:-) I am not on the I2NSF list. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Linda Dunbar" <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> To: <opsawg@ietf.org> Cc: <i2nsf@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 5:27 PM > OpsaWG: > > I2NSF WG has a draft on data models (and information model) of monitoring network security functions: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-0 6 > > It includes data models to retrieve System Alarms, System Events, counters, NSF Events/logs, etc. > > Want to see if there are data models already specified by Ops Area for monitoring network functions which might have some common attributes that I2NSF can import. > > Thanks, Linda Dunbar > > From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:jaehoon.paul@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 6:35 PM > To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@huawei.com>>; Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:ynir.ietf@gmail.com>> > Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org<mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>; skku_secu-brain_all@googlegroups.com<mailto:skku_secu-brain_all@googlegr oups.com>; Sangwon Hyun <swhyun77@gmail.com<mailto:swhyun77@gmail.com>>; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com<mailto:jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>> > Subject: Request for WG Adoption Call on NSF Monitoring Draft > > Hi Linda and Yoav, > As we discussed the last Bangkok meeting, I have merged the two drafts > of Information Model and Data Model for NSF Monitoring into a new > draft called draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06: > > - Two Information and Data Model Drafts . > draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring-07 > . draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-05 > > - A Merged Data Model Draft > . draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-06 > . https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hong-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-0 6 > > The NSF monitoring is very important to manage the I2NSF security service system > in a reliable and scalable fashion. > > Could you start a WG adoption call for this draft? > > Thanks. > > Best Regards, > Paul > -- > =========================== > Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. > Associate Professor > Department of Software > Sungkyunkwan University > Office: +82-31-299-4957 > Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com<mailto:jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>, pauljeong@skku.edu<mailto:pauljeong@skku.edu> > Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php<http://cpslab.skku.edu/p eople-jaehoon-jeong.php>
- [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monito… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for mo… tom petch
- Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for mo… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [OPSAWG] [I2nsf] is there any work in Ops Are… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for mo… Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
- Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for mo… tom petch