IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2328 (4330)

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 09 April 2015 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE121A1EF5 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vc8MuSS_PWdV for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 687B41A1B5E for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbeb7 with SMTP id eb7so106754850obb.3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 07:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FRIppGCMNlkvw87bseNBTnQQXZVIKTAS0PpTurNtl+w=; b=Rs2HcdSCgKiJIwR1ixIX/B9JwFJ80A50dahYemu/F188pJlr1RhuZ8k9YLPd5iMtvk eDuIc0XqUhL2uESiNprQ7ZSZLcvJc/TQwqCHg3iXKIsvp5isJu8QykxrDTo9agIIkiW3 lleQPn3R4A9Pa4lPiKFxa87+unhR5p+FQJYiQNzfRaasUC2izemkG5YTdWE9UEP+fD02 UFpSlOAtJ3dOEFMOgjkfVFt8yIJmTDqzcptbRvn5DalqMGwj7JFt/EDDfV8EqohsNqxV N0XUbH2V7UnrTjbxSbFRS36YY32Yahy239Yf+OSIurEnjHNbr3Q/fWlG5gWzDpmp8diP befA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.161.36 with SMTP id xp4mr39849839oeb.61.1428588513584; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 07:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.44.198 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0FB1A89A-B53B-4318-B22B-38F0E5B10D5E@lindem.com>
References: <20150409023322.C33F0180473@rfc-editor.org> <0FB1A89A-B53B-4318-B22B-38F0E5B10D5E@lindem.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:08:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1re-EG0zVNx+ZnLSwVGEUkmMOfM=4fnd0k1GimmWOH=6_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01160026e1ee8705134b2e3e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/CKrOyl6inaH-rfgQ4xGWipxSGTY>
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ramakrishnadtv@infosys.com
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC2328 (4330)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 14:08:43 -0000

Thanks for the prompt feedback.  It's been verified.

Alia

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@gmail.com> wrote:

> Alia, Alvaro,
>
> I agree this errata should be verified as an editorial errata. It’s an
> editorial errata since the intent of the text is clear as is.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> > On Apr 8, 2015, at 10:33 PM, RFC Errata System <
> rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> >
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
> > "OSPF Version 2".
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=4330
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Editorial
> > Reported by: Ramakrishna Rao DTV <ramakrishnadtv@infosys.com>
> >
> > Section: 3.4
> >
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> >        The link-state database for the backbone is shown in Figure 8.
> >        The set of routers pictured are the backbone routers.  Router
> >        RT11 is a backbone router because it belongs to two areas.  In
> >        order to make the backbone connected, a virtual link has been
> >        configured between Routers R10 and R11.
> >
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> >        The link-state database for the backbone is shown in Figure 8.
> >        The set of routers pictured are the backbone routers.  Router
> >        RT11 is a backbone router because it belongs to two areas.  In
> >        order to make the backbone connected, a virtual link has been
> >        configured between Routers RT10 and RT11.
> >
> > Notes
> > -----
> > s/R10/RT10
> > s/R11/RT11
> >
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : OSPF Version 2
> > Publication Date    : April 1998
> > Author(s)           : J. Moy
> > Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
> > Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
> > Area                : Routing
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSPF mailing list
> > OSPF@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email