Re: [OSPF] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with COMMENT)

[Shraddha Hegde <[e-mail]>]

David/Ben,

Pls see in-line

Rgds
shraddha

-----Original Message-----
From: Black, David [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 7:09 PM
To: Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>; The IESG <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Black, David <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with COMMENT)

Benoit,

> I was initially confused by that sentence.

My understanding is that "independent characteristics" applies on a tag-by-tag basis.  I might suggest:

	Each tag carried by the administrative tag TLV SHOULD be used to
	indicate a characteristic of a node that is independent of the
	characteristics indicated by other administrative tags.
<Shraddha> Thanks for the text. Updating -08 version with above text.

Thanks,
--David


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Claise [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 9:34 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: Black, David; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; 
> draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin- [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> [e-mail]
> Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all 
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
> this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> - "Tags carried by the
>    administrative tag TLV SHOULD be used to indicate independent
>    characteristics of a node."
> 
> I was initially confused by that sentence.
> So there are tags carried by a different TLV than the administrative one?
> Actually, no (I checked with one of the authors).
> I would simply write:
>    "Administrative tag TLV SHOULD be used to indicate independent
>    characteristics of a node."
> 
> This would be in line with the definition:
>    An administrative Tag is a 32-bit integer value that can be used to
>    identify a group of nodes in the OSPF domain.
> 
> - Router information LSA [RFC4970] can have link, area or AS
>    level flooding scope.  Choosing the flooding scope to flood the group
>    tags are defined by the policies and is a local matter.
> 
> "and is a local matter". Hopefully there is some sort of centralized 
> management application that checks consistency.
>