IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pals] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: (with COMMENT)

"Parag Jain (paragj)" <paragj@cisco.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <paragj@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EC412EC23; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C5kDjEMvtIyl; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17BC12EC1A; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 09:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3634; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498061228; x=1499270828; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=zpEkO/2i0EOEs9g4KNZ8t5wXY15INAC1U6Qv6yvE14g=; b=dVj4jTogYxsB7VeFdFHamGQ3bbyXwZkjntByUt+dGs7zAvR2I8HjGv7m iBNmCg6dteQd0QcsjwUnoW3sbcfrB1GoNT1VqfhkFPODvwoPT7Jy+CFvC m0DlIqoatTkzxN5uTWOedSfKQXfoHHmy+FbMtJDc1JeSzHcf0Mblczigs s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DRAAARmUpZ/5xdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1higQ0Hg2WKGadUghEhC4V4AhqCWj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFGQIBAwEBIRE6BgUQAgEIGgImAgICJQsVEAIEAQ0FiiwQqgGCJotUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWBC4VigWArgnmEOxIBHBeCezCCMQWJUo1Lh0UChzGML4IIhUiKPpUQAR84fwt0FUkSAYUvgU12AYc5gSMBgQwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,369,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="260736722"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jun 2017 16:07:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-007.cisco.com (xch-rtp-007.cisco.com [64.101.220.147]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5LG77Bj015689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:07:07 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-007.cisco.com (64.101.220.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:07:07 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:07:06 -0400
From: "Parag Jain (paragj)" <paragj@cisco.com>
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org>, "agmalis@gmail.com" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "zhoutianran@huawei.com" <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pals] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHS6p+GQ52yLcoYQkulsddZF+mG+qIve5qA
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:07:06 +0000
Message-ID: <48E7B47F-F518-4BB8-81F3-89F64D42B5A1@cisco.com>
References: <149805734675.15460.5973682515366030524.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149805734675.15460.5973682515366030524.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.0]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FD8199A86EDADA4B84D5E7D5FF314794@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/6qSFAr2oYgFHonE0KsZGFymXAG8>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:07:16 -0000

HI Benoit

Please see inline.


On 2017-06-21, 11:02 AM, "Pals on behalf of Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <pals-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

    Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
       The LSP Ping Echo request IPv4/UDP packets is encapsulated with the
       MPLS label stack as described in previous sections, followed by one
       of the two encapsulation options:
    
    IPv4 only?

Will fix this.
    
    And here Tianran Zhou's OPS DIR review:
    No issue found. This document is well written, and is ready for publication.
    Only a couple of nits, for the authors consideration:
    
    1. in section 1, "Multipoint LDP (mDLP)"
    
    Is the acronym "mLDP"?

Yes, will fix this.
    
    2. in section 1,
    "Multi-segment Pseudowires support is out of scope of this document at
       present and may be included in future."
    
    At this stage, the I-D is stable. I think you can just say "Multi-segment
    Pseudowires support is out of scope of this document".

Will change the text as per comments above.
    
    3. in section 6,
    "MLDP" should align with the previous acronym in section 1, i.e. "mLDP".

Will fix this.
    
    And there is auto check result from the system:
    
      == Unused Reference: 'RFC5085' is defined on line 325, but no explicit
         reference was found in the text

will fix this.
    
      ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 4379
    
         Summary: 1 error (**), 0 flaws (~~), 1 warning (==), 1 comment (--).
    
         Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about
         the items above.
    
Sure will do.

Thanks
Parag

    
    _______________________________________________
    Pals mailing list
    Pals@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email