Re: [Pals] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 21 June 2017 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD21312947E; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ThIxgGCeSpfX; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CEA8129477; Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v5LIckBa041447 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:39:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <86F1F05C-8BFD-4D58-9244-4AA74D9EE3BA@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:39:08 -0500
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping@ietf.org>, Andrew Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals@ietf.org" <pals@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <70CC86AB-6576-481C-9E17-1A139DAA946D@nostrum.com>
References: <149806697835.15687.8065967734115024532.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <86F1F05C-8BFD-4D58-9244-4AA74D9EE3BA@cisco.com>
To: "Parag Jain (paragj)" <paragj@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pals/royEk048fYTEnqMhq8yVFc_Hex8>
Subject: Re: [Pals] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Pseudowire And LDP-enabled Services dicussion list." <pals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pals/>
List-Post: <mailto:pals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pals>, <mailto:pals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:39:16 -0000

Thanks!

Ben.

> On Jun 21, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Parag Jain (paragj) <paragj@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2017-06-21, 1:42 PM, "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
>    Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>    draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-03: No Objection
> 
>    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>    introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
>    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
>    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pals-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping/
> 
> 
> 
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    COMMENT:
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>    Please expand LSP and FEC on first mention. Please consider expanding PSN and
>    LDP (I see they are marked as "well-known" in the abbreviation list, but I
>    think expansion would be helpful in context.)
> 
> will do.
> 
> Thanks
> Parag
> 
> 
> 
>