[PANRG] Incoming contribution on ECN deployment
Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 09 November 2018 01:29 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: panrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAE9128D0C for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:29:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lR5qun1pSjzc for <panrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:29:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9131E1252B7 for <panrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 17:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id p6so176150lfc.1 for <panrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 17:29:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fbLkFF5nMMJ6HOIYE9EsQGJRCzV2yqighrhUrtxYmNQ=; b=KHQYlgwAMyAt7JxtCW3/6q0+vP8ft6GNfp/9LhnVVNm6qzBqUppYGD8Osf9Hk1udiY kQOwbFnzSoy0TgjGe4H6Ol3XJMEmsR++UBjtnJebUUnCOU5nbvfytyYZPzszdH9OpPpV 7TTWpei9c7dfhZrei09nmVYGPBkW+iJc2Ozzm91xqQ+himZnxdTLdZDfkKICOuGgRfmR JBekGbvmb9kUgINr4G4L2fFgwVzK63ihW5q4L8iDWDq74oFLYvPzh2L6loPC+I/rPDpn d5CmUVZ1bjOehBcQtrAXNMdvonbiCedE8kG/s993AiDe5AX048kQvcDhHx6TNhlMT2KT 4Evg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fbLkFF5nMMJ6HOIYE9EsQGJRCzV2yqighrhUrtxYmNQ=; b=oHQhXGaMwekBNM1YAhZHhdzd8/QgY8boa47sCwrdhvCC6WfLubmpOnt65sZ/etktik Eqwj83EMZpL36Zy87xDM56SOzUCpjMOvM14EL3wwa62xYOi3zaka5H0IywvHfeoNwnNb VECCKwPvDfR2d6LTgV0ZgLMXP2muqqChM1CwwngJ13U/VjTLEpqfeYtJT74xJvYAQ/vS 8cJVv4J4lL5sQbrRiH9sdbPAPmscyk4nHHPRiFXYZIRbPPVJDx/nRu1WHGtZLfQOES+M leuouccYByxONp8kR1pC1+QRU715fn1Flc+68SWDGpuQxdC+VDhZkxPbp+bbJVwMBZHo m14g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gI8U6MYy8Tok0blfXoGAhGh6pKAUwkNVVQ5xcPs/k0lKIQBtNJF c0cVieZ8L++G6qsOCOtpIVt82iflOADu5rVugNIwq6xK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5faTqyoMgHGwcNG0WrbqlqPgJs0N5xjZnljMUS+3J4Q5XBwAGiQQFoEBRxxDA4oXqy5IH8BKEvK9tX4uz3tvi0=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:982:: with SMTP id 124mr3828396lfj.138.1541726995177; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 17:29:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 08:30:09 +0700
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fhPr8AUCRkseb102XQUnLMPGSoj=kZE7qp3ZpX5QBCiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: panrg@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e364a5057a3149af"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/5zs79ApWWImd5BzfgywIkZouWTc>
Subject: [PANRG] Incoming contribution on ECN deployment
X-BeenThere: panrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Path Aware Networking \(Proposed\) Research Group discussion list" <panrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/panrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:panrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg>, <mailto:panrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 01:30:00 -0000
Dear PANRG, After our session this week, I talked with Gorry Fairhurst, who is thinking that ECN deployment would be a useful contribution for draft-irtf-panrg-what-not-to-do. >From what I understand, I agree with Gorry, but wanted to let the RG know that we're discussing this, because the draft now belongs to the RG, and not just to me. If you have thoughts about this, or if you'd like to help, please let me know. Thanks! Spencer
- [PANRG] Incoming contribution on ECN deployment Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [PANRG] Incoming contribution on ECN deployme… Spencer Dawkins at IETF