Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt
Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 08 December 2019 07:00 UTC
Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B19F120046 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 23:00:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17ay3QBx86tM for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 23:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F8B120018 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 2019 23:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id b15so9920686ila.7 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 23:00:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hu9kpt9//tbYFsOpuk2XDUVjX2VfchuaJYjOczN/n+s=; b=bjVe+mNW/j/Qfn4Iyrd3GMRtwPyIDmko8A99m3OW3n8hG1ipRgKd9AuSN9ZsACQghl zsMZxq4XlqfscFO+QQ53FpGgOm7mq0WuY4xKeWxkunI0gbvyBOeYhSjTi928wYXTLxZc suGncNJZ2lTedcqxsMEa6BPuJjdm/8m9IELzM2ssTAwr7ZqL3WKs+3a4E1x6Prv3gPts bbniq+PLHX+/v8ARrGiMBI2tcakJgvANx/xFZ94JukE7KasQlHNP9M/stOiZb1x1U4nC Hn+gjD0HqbCc/B3hc0CzLr8EscbgP6NJ4OYuHJWV1kzECtJjOZBSGNihRS3CpDJCSvw9 +UCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=hu9kpt9//tbYFsOpuk2XDUVjX2VfchuaJYjOczN/n+s=; b=UveSzby8Yokz+drrO5KaaxnOKk2/VoFkK3JynoxKBXpS2WpZH+MJyQGXZ7oRQur7I/ RYjZvcktOam/5h5RWc8nHh9F9BYs/fefyGX+GGN1FDWUy0vWXkCWKaUT8TjYM+MXiAvi xqYHU9wjFe09abl9r3IQT7w24Wr7lJ4pBff0WvOrVM30s84CbVX8kRIUD/XydgrCfdZ5 qGDEvmjCHMQE/pARDLt3/MbGJ6YipXpXNAunybpen3ncuJZBS4YPGYkr1DyW6Ge9uUYO EFBKPMywMtJcUAoyE4a039+04JZ6spSfeZij1ic7I5y+9vIsLV1pumPorgNmg7XL/q5M bLpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXraaKmnkxEkU55SCHu8dK4SCEZ6ZP3EQaPmwc0ShoNgYNtRT9n d9CEfhjFq5eyyXvtz5CeIaI1aM9+bSrN1HWqz70N2g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzdU/ceo5AG8g1cZUxdD1TC0TBFQI0eYhycxGjribWjxBHQabojjXP/aCpyDu1XuXSs6XzJhlUpajkH7qChQVE=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d24d:: with SMTP id v13mr21752392ilg.14.1575788450241; Sat, 07 Dec 2019 23:00:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157314240322.1916.9629098133083944496@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAB75xn7PxggeeWfrveFqBVpwGHPmoSdCbRDCuPq2xVT4jDc+xw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn7PxggeeWfrveFqBVpwGHPmoSdCbRDCuPq2xVT4jDc+xw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 12:30:39 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn7L-b3GGjWakHkd_+xq+8Uy_83-K4Tkq4qW_AR12bx=3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d161b005992bd691"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/5KsVzQOsRcPpBOCI1-PTTDtFwwE>
Subject: Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 07:00:53 -0000
Thanks to everyone who responded. The I-D is shipped to the IESG. Thanks, Dhruv On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 9:37 PM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi WG, > > As instructed by our AD, I-D has been posted with the file name change > - draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags/ > > The chairs request the WG to reaffirm that the WG supports the > publication of the I-D by Friday 22nd Nov. We request you to be vocal > to enable us to judge consensus (and justify it). > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:30 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. > > > > Title : Updated Rules for Processing Stateful PCE > Request Parameters Flags > > Author : Adrian Farrel > > Filename : draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00.txt > > Pages : 6 > > Date : 2019-11-07 > > > > Abstract: > > Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol > > (PCEP) to support stateful Path Computation Elements (PCEs) are > > defined in RFC 8231. One of the extensions is the Stateful PCE > > Request Parameters (SRP) object. That object includes a Flags field > > that is a set of 32 bit flags, and RFC 8281 defines an IANA registry > > for tracking assigned flags. However, RFC 8231 does not explain how > > an implementation should set unassigned flags in transmitted > > messages, nor how an implementation should process unassigned, > > unknown, or unsupported flags in received messages. > > > > This document updates RFC 8231 by defining the correct behaviors. > > > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags/ > > > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00 > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00 > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pce mailing list > > Pce@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > -- Sent from Mobile
- [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-0… internet-drafts
- Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-fla… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-fla… RAGHURAM, ASWATNARAYAN
- Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-fla… Jonathan Hardwick
- Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-fla… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-fla… Qin Wu
- Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-fla… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-fla… Zhenghaomian
- Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-fla… Dhruv Dhody