Re: [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5440 (4555)

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 09 December 2015 12:33 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520781A9044 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:33:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V3NfMAhdvEk3 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:33:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFC711A9035 for <pce@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tB9CWrtW029331; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:32:53 GMT
Received: from 950129200 ([79.141.128.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tB9CWp5X029305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:32:52 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: jpv@cisco.com, jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com, akatlas@gmail.com, db3546@att.com, aretana@cisco.com, jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com, jpv@cisco.com, julien.meuric@orange.com
References: <20151206122427.ADF34180003@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151206122427.ADF34180003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:32:50 -0000
Message-ID: <02f801d1327d$b85a1ff0$290e5fd0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJMetW20tWMazzEAbNQY0jPN6mpqJ3MBXMw
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-21990.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--11.179-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--11.179-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: QW5G6BKkLTo4HKI/yaqRm8zWN98iBBeGkPqe52Sp8B1VbFClxBANxgi9 cmFBBPB+1KSbN/e88rGsg2Bf0V+jfIWDz7mPxd0p71Wx2uUbPLeEHldzTrGjrRwKSCi0KXuEvQK JOxWBZm9Y+XGpfmaXLN0iK4aOzykGlTFYj5iEM4XNjFbNkZ/OVCGi0ftsSkQyaxNXOJgeVJo+g8 hk6wNrblXC0Qaw/rHiZmOikWeBzs5HtiMn7sZRDKm4PbloS2C3+KgiyLtJrSCyd65qZFFPkzpbf dTAcNXm4vM1YF6AJbZcLc3sLtjOt1ZFWWuOwo7w3QfwsVk0UbtuRXh7bFKB7lpcXwBOHa0lHjW8 9h8Sr1KYF2H8swDFSLuWoAMPyxg3xYVzI3UCCaY=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/B2YjysbXu7dHQoHFPdMJgmvD8RM>
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5440 (4555)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:33:07 -0000

That looks right to me.
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
> Sent: 06 December 2015 12:24
> To: jpv@cisco.com; jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com; akatlas@gmail.com;
> db3546@att.com; aretana@cisco.com; jonathan.hardwick@metaswitch.com;
> jpv@cisco.com; julien.meuric@orange.com
> Cc: pce@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Pce] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5440 (4555)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5440,
> "Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5440&eid=4555
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mahendra Singh Negi <mahendrasingh@huawei.com>
> 
> Section: Appendix A.
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 
>    The following set of variables are initialized:
> 
>       TCPRetry=0,
> 
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 
>    The following set of variables are initialized:
> 
>       ConnectRetry=0,
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Variable TCPRetry is not defined,  defined variable is
>  ConnectRetry.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5440 (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol
(PCEP)
> Publication Date    : March 2009
> Author(s)           : JP. Vasseur, Ed., JL. Le Roux, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Path Computation Element
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce