IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] [pce] :New Version Notification for draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-00.txt

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A46D120131 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 21:28:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bfk-_MPHtQdh for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 21:28:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB96D120104 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Dec 2019 21:28:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id u17so32236948ilq.5 for <pce@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 21:28:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XjtpXPaOb/+nWHQYpf2hXm03fwJns/78ngx6LNgSvps=; b=cWptAAiAXDxGPJpDy3xOeRC3YgGjnvd0UBprc5UI+aUlqzzr6VITBgodoJtxwmQ+RX HnMFvkG9smZAt0cQ8r8bBevznU+qJ4HS28To9QsZm13D1rXUZHTjiuh5Ejb2rmT68EBM 8FDMoNo/se2RBMN5ky6daGfBozFbS5KvMq+7xeZFZ0q/NkV1NPVJ9zO4z8SrKpEsNpiQ PSE5W3hK85Ac+9rimPz1MRQaBidMBc+v36iX8PWFDtRJDQswP+9i8IXWRbfXNnnnY5bF r0VgV0y/MprYX/CYS+mPjPgqinA5bRBY5c54DU+WcjNupbkTOL2s0qjcqUY3tePNb7i9 afkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XjtpXPaOb/+nWHQYpf2hXm03fwJns/78ngx6LNgSvps=; b=enAVU5cpKx5o888zkW0Kmujw5rM+7gveMMF+h9eSgwd/rc1XHSdM5SsBup7vpORvod XaXDm46ouq85wNE292h7dqyp8ZdVzmnj/pobTeP8DLGkA6XTfynmUwEIS0cTLBDXpj3W lQ9p9DxkWktFMGjtdzq0nK1UtqmBQbBtP5N15hclgxZn9iAg27cOHyVrZPVzBI9SdbVC nggWIKgzeK9n4VPrdLpCw39vpRYQtMuOfbyAG5wl0Y7fpyUl75N4KKenvFELVan4V/Yg 4honxU2GvNaggvjpIhmdGq/11sZYh8zO/O6eNcNU3c8ZkjBvibbzkOyVEW983+2ueX21 P+1w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX17DxqGiA/eOZ8j5RuKg4rUMmqOtX85RkvPdH4ylQ9TclMmxgU QDdz8PM1oVerkoRc/k1dbwLqLHMwnRbyi/XnJgQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqysiuVqr1AeJI4v06JDsRZWDb8fpFvqe9m8Y8204+VD2EvxYyoelY6+CfUyybekTCfhwOSbiK8eeSA70ZBks30=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:9959:: with SMTP id p86mr12081647ili.124.1575264502853; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 21:28:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB75xn6DuwZFSk0KLQcotz0M0tMNsNTmWf5Sa3T0Bso4wg4e8g@mail.gmail.com> <201912020932468871773@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <201912020932468871773@zte.com.cn>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 10:57:46 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn7fQA32i+E_qeCancJk8vfjyHEiEotq=xekBpUAfZN6Eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: xiong.quan@zte.com.cn
Cc: Farrel Adrian <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <andrew.stone@nokia.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, pce@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/SpE8KU4nOHlSMMcSHFdcMgGGCXc>
Subject: Re: [Pce] [pce] :New Version Notification for draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-00.txt
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 05:28:25 -0000

Hi Quan,

> But for the last issue, I am not sure if the length of 32 bits is good or not. If 32 bits is enough for the extensions of other I-Ds?
>
> What is your suggestion?

I can think of one case: PCE capability flags in [1], where we defined
it as an array of units of 32-bit flags   numbered from the most
significant as bit zero, where  each bit represents one flag. In the
corresponding IANA registry [2], we maintained it as 32 bits for now,
which can be easily updated by a future document when needed.

As a WG contributor, I think it is better to be future proof even
though 32 bits seems good enough at the present.

Thanks!
Dhruv


[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5088#section-4.5
[2] https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospfv2-parameters/ospfv2-parameters.xhtml#ospfv2-parameters-14

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email