IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: (with DISCUSS)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 10 July 2019 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259E912004D; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.247, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c3tJBj4afCo4; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com (mail-io1-f50.google.com [209.85.166.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23B2F12004A; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id h6so7400464iom.7; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dZ42Xq1yFDiwxvx6S4gWAFE2+Wlm5nOHsynY6+Hq7BQ=; b=ZpMYoxNeZfe1H0bFX/gAXfX/8Ddl3AcHoPmx3qhRGT1kznuXPHbt1OT80vLNYU/Gxj 5qaJeyAmhua/pEOg577dOoOw+avIjwLzz1OoqDSxtaAaBSTgYxsUkhpkfqyjDanQIOhR BUq9q8DXDx5H09WlUONILlwr933k15M1KLweLMn61lfT2Vwxw0xHycilwioolQtrsgvn 64gLNYDp+CTjCp+3X7FnRzotcZRSFU2YkVOBRY9iXIgLpeIjqXUjTfz28c0juR6kVdrR eENroM6AaQY6kJ18ZuarGJutpkxjPfQB2oOD89fU/FMeUpEjb5ig83HoxLeZXUi904RU Long==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXuaJM4Q0/ZoPpitf6pI6Clj+LsZ2mJwegV+JNS2Vjs4z21PiSB El0OpXoma8UTzGPDnlFqL+T4TcnFo2foCWue2no=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3Upzgut6TgwgxATG01ZFSYU35FDbpGj8ieOHOFyWPdbVhgUU9DYts6Eek/3e+J0C20UbcPTNOnf1uq+g+Y+c=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:c744:: with SMTP id g4mr32517157iop.187.1562788599978; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156274054523.15505.17994880377246642196.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8DB19654@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B8DB19654@BLREML503-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:56:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+Pbdqq_oCC+D2s-5KCYzKVZqntOB_+OVdefTJULFvbeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-association-group@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-association-group@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/cq1OFmdAPoJNIBnvbaPPGz6PjJM>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 19:56:43 -0000

Thanks, Dhruv.  I will go remove my DISCUSS now.

Barry

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Barry,
>
> I have fixed this in my working copy with RFC 8051 as normative reference. Will publish the update when the submission tool reopens.
>
> Working Copy: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-10.txt
> Diff: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-10.txt
>
> Regards,
> Dhruv
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba via
> > Datatracker
> > Sent: 10 July 2019 12:06
> > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> > Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-association-
> > group@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Pce] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-association-group-
> > 09: (with DISCUSS)
> >
> > Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09: Discuss
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-group/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCUSS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > A tiny thing, trivial to fix:
> >
> > — Section 2 —
> >
> >    This document uses the following terms defined in [RFC8051]: Stateful
> >    PCE, Active Stateful PCE, Passive Stateful PCE, and Delegation.
> >
> > I think this makes 8051 a normative reference.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pce mailing list
> > Pce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email