[Pce] RSO Draft pointer - on response of the draft-litkowski-pce-association-diversity
Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 05:40 UTC
Return-Path: <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A789312968F for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:40:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VLQT7aJSdnMi for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:40:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88C8129671 for <pce@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:40:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CVG20426; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:40:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.70) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:40:07 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.215]) by szxema411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:40:03 +0800
From: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
To: "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>
Thread-Topic: RSO Draft pointer - on response of the draft-litkowski-pce-association-diversity
Thread-Index: AdI/y+AHxgUqrtFCSeWKwoUpZYDjxA==
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:40:03 +0000
Message-ID: <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A43985F213@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.112.106]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A43985F213SZXEMA504MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A010201.582BF139.003F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.7.215, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: ca4bab03158a97c049771a89c43dbd76
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/h5OO8fPI7HhSqol4lUnj03o1elA>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] RSO Draft pointer - on response of the draft-litkowski-pce-association-diversity
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:40:23 -0000
Hi Stephane, Great discussion in PCE. The Resource Sharing Object (RSO) draft I mentioned in pce WG can be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing/. I think we are working on similar scenarios with different flags, which are complimentary with each other. I am also wondering whether such kind of association work need to differentiate IP PCE with Optical PCE or not, and what's your preference. Thank you. Best wishes, Haomian
- [Pce] RSO Draft pointer - on response of the draf… Zhenghaomian