Re: [Pce] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-11: (with COMMENT)

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D25E130F82; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:44:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZI4CuRrAxA3H; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC6C130FA9; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:44:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 009415636DC9086EA275; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 01:44:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.38) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 01:44:22 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.95]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.173]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 17:44:20 -0800
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext@ietf.org>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>, "daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-11: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUvVDKoKseyTliy0WGMIDP1cCrnaXTj74g
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 01:44:20 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173D0D3E3A@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <154937076957.32255.7634791989083733613.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <154937076957.32255.7634791989083733613.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.123]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E173D0D3E3Asjceml521mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/jsW-EXQpOGAz_GNFzdxZ-8yA98Y>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 01:44:28 -0000

Hi Alexey,



Thanks for your comments. Please see in-line for my response to each of your comments. Please let me know if you would have further comments.



Thanks & best regards,

Young



-----Original Message-----

From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:aamelnikov@fastmail.fm]

Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 6:46 AM

To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>

Cc: draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext@ietf.org; Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>; pce-chairs@ietf.org; daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com; pce@ietf.org

Subject: Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-11: (with COMMENT)



Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for

draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-11: No Objection



When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)





Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html

for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.





The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext/







----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMENT:

----------------------------------------------------------------------



Benjamin's DISCUSS is a superset of issues I spotted, so I am agreeing with it.



In Section 4.1:



     . Wavelength Selection TLV (32 bits): See Section 4.2 for

        details.



Is TLV value 32 bit or the whole TLV? (This is the same issue as raised by Benjamin)



YL>> The whole TLV.



In Section 4.3:



   o  Link Identifiers: Identifies each link ID for which restriction

   is applied. The length is dependent on the link format and the Count

   field.



Is the type field extensible?



YL>> Yes.



   See Section 4.3.1. for Link Identifier encoding and Section

   4.3.2. for the Wavelength Restriction Field encoding, respectively.



8.5. New PCEP TLV: Optical Interface Class List TLV



   As described in Section 4.3, a new PCEP TLV is defined to indicate

   the optical interface class list. IANA is to allocate this new TLV

   from the "PCEP TLV Type Indicators" subregistry

   (http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-tlv-type-

   indicators).



   Value             Description                Reference

   ---------------------------------------------------------

   TBD5              Optical Interface          [This.I-D]

                     Class List



I don't see TBD5 referenced anywhere else in the document.



YL>> Thanks for finding this out. Added TBD5 in Section 4.4 where “The encoding for the Optical Interface Class List (TBD5) is described …



8.6. New PCEP TLV: Client Signal TLV



   As described in Section 4.3, a new PCEP TLV is defined to indicate

   the client signal information. IANA is to allocate this new TLV from

   the "PCEP TLV Type Indicators" subregistry

   (http://www.iana.org/assignments/pcep/pcep.xhtml#pcep-tlv-type-

   indicators).



   Value             Description                Reference

   ---------------------------------------------------------

   TBD6              Client Signal Information  [This.I-D]



I don't see TBD6 referenced anywhere else in the document either.



YL>> Thanks for finding this out. Added TBD6 in Section 4.4 where “The encoding for the Client Signal information  (TBD6) is described …