IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

Khasanov Boris <khasanov.boris@huawei.com> Thu, 19 December 2019 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <khasanov.boris@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970DF120116 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:31:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1S1OvexOfWw5 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E27A4120113 for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:31:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B82CCAA295E821CC67AD; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:31:54 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml718-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.69) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:31:54 +0000
Received: from lhreml717-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.68) by lhreml718-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:31:54 +0000
Received: from lhreml717-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.201.108.68]) by lhreml717-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.201.108.68]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:31:54 +0000
From: Khasanov Boris <khasanov.boris@huawei.com>
To: "julien.meuric@orange.com" <julien.meuric@orange.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling
Thread-Index: AQHVq4vVKDqYiVAJYk+FZL2R2JGf9afBNVvA
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:31:54 +0000
Message-ID: <d37959ec75ae4dedb20bb020e716d9f0@huawei.com>
References: <e3248b24-5615-79d6-080a-c07a7491ded3@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <e3248b24-5615-79d6-080a-c07a7491ded3@orange.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.198.247.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/oAvvoOCSp-qIiG8r6XCKig6o6pU>
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:31:59 -0000

Hi Julien, Dhruv and all,

I read the draft and strongly support its publication. Scheduled LSP is a good proposal from many points of view, I see such requirement in real networks too.

SY,
Boris

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meuric@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 7:47 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

Dear PCE WG,

This message starts a 2-week PCE WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-10. Please review the document and share your comments and/or interest using the PCE mailing list by Thursday December 19.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email