Re: [Pce] Next Steps for IRO, Domain-Seq documents...

<julien.meuric@orange.com> Mon, 12 January 2015 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D921A8AF6 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:40:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g5swYf0nb_b0 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias245.francetelecom.com [80.12.204.245]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8522C1A8AF4 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.200]) by omfeda09.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 0124AC09FD; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:40:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfeda07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id CF97015808E; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:40:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.193.71.211] (10.197.38.2) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.114.1.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:40:30 +0100
Message-ID: <29817_1421062830_54B3B2AE_29817_2225_1_54B3B2AD.5020208@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:40:29 +0100
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
Organization: Orange
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
References: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870214AC@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870214AC@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.197.38.2]
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.12.22.200030
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/sWsRVbAdoUIIxmi6MtpKZ3UelF8>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Next Steps for IRO, Domain-Seq documents...
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:40:35 -0000

Hi Dhruv.

Please see inline...

Julien


Jan. 07, 2015 - Dhruv Dhody:
> Hi All,
>
> Happy New Year!
>
> Let's start with some questions to the WG and Chairs.
>
> 1. IRO-Survey (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iro-survey/)
> 	Should this informational survey be adopted and moved towards RFC?
> 		Or just dropped...
[JM] This was preliminary and necessary work for the following I-D. Not 
sure the overhead from authors/chairs/shepherds to reach RFC is 
required, but if the WG thinks otherwise, we may consider it.

>
> 2. IRO-Update (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-iro-update/)
> 	WG Adoption Call?
> 		A simple I-D, should be fast tracked?
> 			Other WG documents in PCE, TEAS are dependent on it.
[JM] This is the significant output of the above. We will proceed 
accordingly.

>
> 3. Domain-Sequence (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/)
>       Wenhu asked WG about the track of the document, What is the WG opinion? Does it needs to be on standards track?
> 		Ready to be moved along towards publication...
[JM] Here, we really need to hear the WG's opinion. It is not too late 
to change (again), but we need to see more views about this before 
moving again.

>
> Please provide your suggestions on progressing these documents...
>
> Regards,
> Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors)
>

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.