IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Thought on SRP flags

Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 10:02 UTC

Return-Path: <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27721296CA; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:02:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=metaswitch.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NA06_Jx2VJ6K; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02on0107.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E305F1296BE; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:02:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=metaswitch.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=f84VmhLn6s3bYLKmZcb2ISLkVnMivoqkgxTMQ1GHp0w=; b=OYXT8UU3VWxXMQVM+qRp9udxvHnM6+uE39RbBRRKmm1rvrrDPMnePijn/g+JsRXO5R1qZF9L7Ol1dwkmdmoWzXDNkydEnyDkdbR/6UZsdQVo8egAkrlOdVGbwgww6WS9YM+khDEGZLyj42RC/1jrg7ASPbQyewBCYU2e8Ujjlvc=
Received: from BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.163.75.152) by BY2PR0201MB1911.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.163.75.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.707.6; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:02:09 +0000
Received: from BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.75.152]) by BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.75.152]) with mapi id 15.01.0734.007; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:02:09 +0000
From: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org" <draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Thought on SRP flags
Thread-Index: AdI/32jJpkEbQoCSQDC76wO2vn5LoAAEMsrQ
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:02:08 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR0201MB1910CFCAE76C16702745CB8984BE0@BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <06f201d23fdf$e06bbe20$a1433a60$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <06f201d23fdf$e06bbe20$a1433a60$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com;
x-originating-ip: [58.120.104.2]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0201MB1911; 7:4LoICOpwOwa2HlYu2are/LQpR3oSocC9cyzZvwge5GhQLNxP4TK7Q/DJ46N1UgxNVOvWL1mc4uFi4FVmX2oaoLYmDVHAwK40VsXQR6Sx9T1cY5crAr/1PGAo4p148a6HK/kqiTSBYToQXyUvTxHSTbNGb1XeEigVpaB3MesOvcFhBxkIv9TNZAWRgXdzH61DdOLV4zkRhNiFTJ/IgtYOUoFmXNRRCFqJCk5+j6AFDgRtPmLm9/QPcryEHAWprOq6CExT8L3HTB2qAOekp/nHAmiMZTFRdV4vDIsv93bV9Z494IZ4Kiv6tVM1D8JPh1gmD6k3drp0DPlCpiwOnGzsXlkgSNj37nU4wTs385u7xKc=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2aa1be46-38be-4520-51c9-08d40e07a128
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:BY2PR0201MB1911;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR0201MB1911382633171A2705608EFE84BE0@BY2PR0201MB1911.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6060326)(6040281)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041223)(6061324); SRVR:BY2PR0201MB1911; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0201MB1911;
x-forefront-prvs: 01283822F8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(13464003)(199003)(189002)(5001770100001)(4326007)(2906002)(3280700002)(97736004)(305945005)(7736002)(3660700001)(2501003)(7846002)(81156014)(6116002)(87936001)(6506003)(66066001)(2900100001)(102836003)(92566002)(3846002)(229853002)(2950100002)(99286002)(8676002)(105586002)(68736007)(33656002)(76576001)(74316002)(8936002)(7696004)(86362001)(106356001)(122556002)(189998001)(50986999)(5660300001)(54356999)(81166006)(77096005)(101416001)(76176999)(9686002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0201MB1911; H:BY2PR0201MB1910.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: metaswitch.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: metaswitch.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Nov 2016 10:02:08.4585 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9d9e56eb-f613-4ddb-b27b-bfcdf14b2cdb
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0201MB1911
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/sy9tUcY2TOsOEsmF83Kiwm6HPns>
Cc: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Thought on SRP flags
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:02:16 -0000

Hi Adrian

draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp defines the R flag and requests IANA to create the registry in section 8.3.  Registries cannot be created during IANA early allocation, so we need to wait for this draft to be published.  (As an aside, I believe that IANA are considering changing that policy down the line.)

Cheers
Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 16 November 2016 17:03
To: draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request@ietf.org
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Thought on SRP flags

Hi,

Just reading your I-D during the meeting (sorry, but better now than never :-)

I think we need a registry for the flags in the SRP registry.

Maybe that should be in draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce? But it could also be in your document.

And if we need evidence that this is needed, your figure 1 shows the 'R' flag, but there is no mention of it in the text, so I assume you have seen it in some other document.

Cheers,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email