Re: [Pce] Request for review on <draft-pce-mib-extensions-01>

Vaidya Ramany <vramany@Brocade.com> Mon, 10 April 2017 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <vramany@Brocade.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445A112871F; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 20:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gbZe6dHZez3v; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 20:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:71::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6F62127275; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 20:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0048192.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v3A3IDLA027716; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 20:18:31 -0700
Received: from brmwp-exmb11.corp.brocade.com ([208.47.132.227]) by mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29py54crbc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:18:30 -0700
Received: from BRMWP-EXMB14.corp.brocade.com (172.16.59.141) by BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com (172.16.59.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 21:18:26 -0600
Received: from BRMWP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (172.16.59.130) by BRMWP-EXMB14.corp.brocade.com (172.16.59.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 21:18:26 -0600
Received: from BRMWP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com ([fe80::c813:1b29:645:33bf]) by BRMWP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com ([fe80::c813:1b29:645:33bf%25]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sun, 9 Apr 2017 21:18:25 -0600
From: Vaidya Ramany <vramany@Brocade.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, Dheeraj Parchuru <dparchur@Brocade.com>
CC: Dilip Kumar <kumard@brocade.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "pce-chairs@ietf.org" <pce-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Request for review on <draft-pce-mib-extensions-01>
Thread-Index: AdKvCzK/WEU7DZ1HSQq0M1O61GkSbABsbluAADrqebA=
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 03:18:25 +0000
Message-ID: <00a8737b977b4a9a9cfdc60f2dfb594f@BRMWP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com>
References: <bbad8c7943364605a9286335400055fb@BRMWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com> <CAB75xn4S8+3mGQXX-2hpXH74sdCoQrHg8hq5dJdgJoFFFcfr3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn4S8+3mGQXX-2hpXH74sdCoQrHg8hq5dJdgJoFFFcfr3w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.252.200.61]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_00a8737b977b4a9a9cfdc60f2dfb594fBRMWPEXMB12corpbrocadec_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-04-09_14:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1704100025
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wKW_A1iOEgnIhqveoJpDP1mOc7A>
Subject: Re: [Pce] Request for review on <draft-pce-mib-extensions-01>
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 03:18:38 -0000

Hi Dhruv,

Thanks for the feedback.
For the questions below:

(1) It would be good to ask the WG, if there is a will to continue to work on the MIBs.
In the past, the feedback was to move towards Yang.
OK. This sounds reasonable.
Would you be aware of any existing discussion threads on this topic that we can refer to?

(2)  It would be nice, if we can maintain consistency between the MIB and the Yang models.
This would be contingent on the answer to (1) I believe.

(3) You need to link the new extended pcePcepXEntityEntry/ pcePcepXPeerEntry/ pcePcepXSessEntry created a new table with the existing entries in the entity/peer/session table.
We are using the AUGMENTS feature to extend the existing tables. Did you have something else in mind?

Thanks,
Vaidya

From: Pce [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2017 10:38 PM
To: Dheeraj Parchuru <dparchur@Brocade.com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <kumard@brocade.com>; pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Request for review on <draft-pce-mib-extensions-01>

Hi Dheeraj,

(1) It would be good to ask the WG, if there is a will to continue to work on the MIBs.
In the past, the feedback was to move towards Yang.

(2)  It would be nice, if we can maintain consistency between the MIB and the Yang models.
The yang can be found at - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dpce-2Dpcep-2Dyang_&d=DwMFaQ&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=g28q3pOgXDY3WFHMMERBxxQaNJXIW2JQWKz6oovJTVo&m=7DYiV1Uzc9iEq0-DKzFODx56_v3x_ehr06BMQ3e1xCo&s=Ld9cpbSyMYh1HeoujQoImgEd3zVNDPiaFEblH_Cjf4U&e=>
If you would like to see some changes in Yang, lets discuss them.

(3) You need to link the new extended pcePcepXEntityEntry/ pcePcepXPeerEntry/ pcePcepXSessEntry created a new table with the existing entries in the entity/peer/session table.

Regards,
Dhruv




On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Dheeraj Parchuru <dparchur@brocade.com<mailto:dparchur@brocade.com>> wrote:
Hi,

Please take a few minutes to write a review to the below draft for PCEP MIB Extensions. Thank you !


Name:                  draft-pce-mib-extensions

Revision:              01

Title:                      Extensions to the Path Computation Element Protocol(PCEP) Management Information Base(MIB) Module

Document date:               2016-10-07

Group:                  Individual Submission

Pages:                   22

URL:            https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_internet-2Ddrafts_draft-2Dpce-2Dmib-2Dextensions-2D01.txt&d=DQICaQ&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=ZkEFLDwLRPKreZ18Kptz_z547aAkiIkkoJfsKoKt6pQ&m=Iwpd2O0WWICXlZdaioTBE5dalfw7mmu7XITogSst-k8&s=nZ9JKuHe-KrMUtz_f5ImB7_F0LT6pXc8oPww-CIqgKI&e=

Status:         https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dpce-2Dmib-2Dextensions_&d=DQICaQ&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=ZkEFLDwLRPKreZ18Kptz_z547aAkiIkkoJfsKoKt6pQ&m=Iwpd2O0WWICXlZdaioTBE5dalfw7mmu7XITogSst-k8&s=JtRLQcjMpzcbJZzY_c0QJhiGAj7d4YjaixuJactmsyA&e=

Htmlized:       https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dpce-2Dmib-2Dextensions-2D01&d=DQICaQ&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=ZkEFLDwLRPKreZ18Kptz_z547aAkiIkkoJfsKoKt6pQ&m=Iwpd2O0WWICXlZdaioTBE5dalfw7mmu7XITogSst-k8&s=Z1Z50_bGtB0IfVEG889281Y2IVdeuEu4vY12OOMBYEo&e=

Diff:           https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_rfcdiff-3Furl2-3Ddraft-2Dpce-2Dmib-2Dextensions-2D01&d=DQICaQ&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=ZkEFLDwLRPKreZ18Kptz_z547aAkiIkkoJfsKoKt6pQ&m=Iwpd2O0WWICXlZdaioTBE5dalfw7mmu7XITogSst-k8&s=5hDsoNhKRRKG3ev6r67OOMQYv2OiUp-6tp4iZGlsqyA&e=



Abstract:

   This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)

   for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.

   In particular, it describes extensions to the managed objects for

   modeling of the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol

   (PCEP) for communications between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and

   a Path Computation Element (PCE), or between two PCEs, that support

   stateful capabilities.

- Regards
Dheeraj


_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_pce&d=DwMFaQ&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=g28q3pOgXDY3WFHMMERBxxQaNJXIW2JQWKz6oovJTVo&m=7DYiV1Uzc9iEq0-DKzFODx56_v3x_ehr06BMQ3e1xCo&s=iZKw21qVSfOusmzSLrKrtu5kDzT_If3MIOcMks5mPqU&e=>