[Pce] progress on draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-07

"Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=7905fe4d11=hshah@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E486712D83B for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z3yHehJgDNCq for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.144.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9C7112D5DF for <pce@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0000419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u37FEUJa001249; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:17:20 -0400
Received: from vawvcgsie2k1301.ciena.com (lin1-118-36-35.ciena.com [63.118.36.35]) by mx0a-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 225q751jy1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:17:20 -0400
Received: from ONWVEXCHHT01.ciena.com (10.128.6.16) by VAWVCGSIE2K1301.ciena.com (10.4.62.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:17:18 -0400
Received: from ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com ([::1]) by ONWVEXCHHT01.ciena.com ([::1]) with mapi; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:17:18 -0400
From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
To: Jonathan Hardwick <Jonathan.Hardwick@metaswitch.com>, "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:17:16 -0400
Thread-Topic: progress on draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-07
Thread-Index: AdGQ4B4EOviHliFXSyWXxm3VBHPXkA==
Message-ID: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BA8809D38@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.1412-7.000.1014-22246.000
x-tm-as-result: No--42.950600-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BA8809D38ONWVEXCHMB04cie_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-04-07_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1601100000 definitions=main-1604070216
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/xfPFDcHPpMMbUfxiptG1AnL1pGg>
Subject: [Pce] progress on draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-07
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:26:57 -0000

PCE chairs -

I believe that proposed scheme described in this draft for auto-bw control through PCE has a useful application in PCE based networks.
I would like to see the progress on this draft and recommend that WG adopt this draft as WG doc.

Thanks,
Himanshu
Ciena