Re: [Pce] About draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-extension-l3vpn
Peng JIANG <pe-jiang@kddi.com> Mon, 15 October 2012 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <pe-jiang@kddi.com>
X-Original-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6127B21F8469 for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xzx7lacq+S7J for <pce@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from UTMC1102.kddi.com (athena.kddi.com [210.141.112.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD1921F845C for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from UTMC1134 (unknown [10.5.16.201]) by UTMC1102.kddi.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 109C62DD9; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:38:30 +0900 (JST)
Received: from UTMC1122.kddi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.kddi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F195745; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:38:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from UTMC1117.kddi.com (unknown [10.5.16.29]) by UTMC1122.kddi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28365743; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:38:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: from KDDI-0806PC0671 ([10.200.129.117] [10.200.129.117]) by post-ims.kddi.com with ESMTPA; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:38:26 +0900
To: jvasseur@cisco.com, pe-jiang@kddi.com
From: Peng JIANG <pe-jiang@kddi.com>
References: <201210151120.AHI81244.QFtBOHJK@kddi.com> <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A7721FE06A3@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <03B78081B371D44390ED6E7BADBB4A7721FE06A3@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
Message-Id: <201210151638.AGF34889.JOKQtBHF@kddi.com>
X-Mailer: Winbiff [Version 2.51 PL3]
X-Accept-Language: ja,en,zh
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:38:25 +0900
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-WAuditID: 1210151638260000414721
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 01:13:06 -0700
Cc: ta-miyasaka@kddi.com, pce@ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com
Subject: Re: [Pce] About draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-extension-l3vpn
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:38:32 -0000
Dear JP, Cc: KDDI Miyasaka-san Thank you very much for your quick reply. > JP> Yes I believe that it is now time to get back to the PCE WG for a last presentation. Thank you very much for your suggestion. We would like to request a presentation slot for 5 or 10 minutes. Could you please assign one to us? My colleague Miyasaka-san will attend IETF85 and he is willing to make this presentation. Best Regards, Peng JIANG KDDI > Dear Jiang-san, > > On Oct 15, 2012, at 4:20 AM, Peng JIANG wrote: > > > Dear JP, > > > > I am one of the co-authors of draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep- > > extension-l3vpn. This draft defines the PCEP extensions for the > > dynamic creation of MPLS TE LSPs between BGP/MPLS IP-VPN sites. > > > > We have been waiting for the signaling protocol(draft-kumaki- > > murai-l3vpn-rsvp-te) to be standarized. Now, the IESG Last Call > > has finished and we are now waiting for the Go-Ahead sign of the > > sponsor AD. > > > > Since the signaling protocol standardization is almost finished > > now, we are considering progressing the PCEP extension draft to > > a WG item. > > > > It has been a while since we last present the WG. Do you think > > it is proper that we remind the WG on the list about the > > contents of the PCEP extension together with the progress of the > > signaling protocol and then ask for WG last call? I think we > > have agreed to progress the PCEP extension once the signaling > > protocol standardization is finished. > > > > JP> Yes I believe that it is now time to get back to the PCE WG for a last presentation. > > Thanks! > > JP. > > > Best Regards, > > Peng JIANG > > KDDI > > _______________________________________________ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce >
- Re: [Pce] About draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-exten… JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- [Pce] About draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-extension… Peng JIANG
- Re: [Pce] About draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-exten… Peng JIANG
- Re: [Pce] About draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-exten… Peng JIANG
- Re: [Pce] About draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-exten… Peng JIANG
- Re: [Pce] About draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-exten… JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
- Re: [Pce] About draft-kumaki-murai-pce-pcep-exten… Peng JIANG