Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!

Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan <jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 07 October 2016 13:13 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008E3DFD7@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <CAOxcgciQ3La-ORPFE84qZN05hNRbjLrSJNMmCe5e5pP89oKZ3g@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008E3DF7A@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAOxcgcgg-xMaJptNVQEb2bsQFg9Fiy5OCGAiXzoOUzA0SY1XmA@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008E3DFD7@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan <jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 18:43:53 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOxcgchip+vxzYHpf65SCD1vntj_4UgV65FCCwVwKPiPNBdwCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144b326a25911053e462eee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/FeLNXUupIHA56gs1YT5-drQE9H4>
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!
Precedence: list

Oh.. is it?

Thanks for your replies Med. :)

Regards,
Jay

On Friday 7 October 2016, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> Re-,
>
>
>
> I’m afraid there is less chance to see this revived. There is no activity
> anymore in the PCP WG.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>
>
>
> *De :* Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan [mailto:jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com');>]
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 7 octobre 2016 14:07
> *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN
> *Cc :* pcp@ietf.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pcp@ietf.org');>
> *Objet :* Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!
>
>
>
> Hi Med,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>
>
> Are you aware of any plans to revive the draft or the reasons why it was
> shelved?
>
>
>
> I feel having that document would have helped for interoperability as you
> have rightly mentioned.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jay
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mohamed.boucadair@orange.com');>> wrote:
>
> Dear Jay,
>
>
>
> Yes, that draft expired.
>
>
>
> FWIW, our PCP deployment in DS-Lite contexts adopt the following design:
>
> ·         Use plain IPv6 to contact the PCP server.
>
> ·         If no PCP server is explicitly configured, the PCP client must
> use the AFTR as its PCP server.
>
> ·         THIRD_PARTY is enabled.
>
>
>
> Having a document would be helpful for interoperability but it was not a
> blocking point in our case.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>
>
>
> *De :* pcp [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pcp-bounces@ietf.org');>] *De la part de*
> Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 7 octobre 2016 13:00
> *À :* pcp@ietf.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pcp@ietf.org');>
> *Objet :* [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> As I can see, the draft-ietf-pcp-dslite seems to have expired quite long
> back and there is no further activity on this.
>
>
>
> I tried searching through the archives and couldn't find relevant details
> as to why it was not carried forward.
>
>
>
> Also, can someone point to me, if some other draft/RFC exists which
> relates to using PCP with DS-Lite?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jay
>
>
>

[pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-p… Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan
Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ie… Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan
Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ie… Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan