Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!

Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan <jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 07 October 2016 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97A412958D for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 06:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sCCCIqg5T5Jh for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 06:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x231.google.com (mail-vk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80EC11295AC for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 06:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 2so10743707vkb.3 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 06:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LBRVFDLl9VlizXiu7kPzm1MwP2JE7B0ch9WclDBgygM=; b=V2vJt2R8qEN4UgNX2LmPlcwAVtfB5HsNZFTg8K4lg5EGQ9zl7K8SC5lvltHiXW0G1K O3+wLRKfNPV8PeSstA6Id82QGBg0Ax5uRwf0f0hFXtqgkEnyAonGtXLzXMMwW6hHDO/8 MjSEzQBBT4dmCgCjRbNlhIhrxrPmULoEtXKZqfrkjtV+VkrcjWu61UWnI1+PGhtY+XJj SkSa73RFLJLoFz2fhMcPwwSDdZZ7nCZ3o4/MZDFz5YyMKbyM029p6cfuUD9py0VT+CAZ ymyZAh3XPiu1MRvk/1RdzloggS2fJX3ONOU9hSQOcNPBkgmAANODORh/7W3igFelEFbR /reQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LBRVFDLl9VlizXiu7kPzm1MwP2JE7B0ch9WclDBgygM=; b=a3IC5g1RBvNOj7Tkn7oLtsqHEB0ioUJRS1t1+/puMU20+hfJJfyFa+8JCvzENR71gL UuQKIiycqpMqSRagH3uM/rI85KgJs/wTCUPAedMKdwAYKovxwdFfU+dD69AKdAzEqXI4 F/k0bPem2TPwqTOuRXRAuEyvWGlMtWgEnDye/9dc0trkbt+/ggG3vlWqth6wPCY5DlnX /tqC87yktO6OlNNg4ehclPew/RreG+hxz6WzwegRwixsCrQqyoZPbxnu1FMPZW066Es0 /it7Pq/tvbwNUzGXX2hdYoUvoePdbpXPGcKfwG9nloK3SIVaMcllmaGuiMXt9z4vi6QB AT4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnW1hxylefJ3Ek4rMT/opQy1SYKHzID2x/V5ho1zzFyIXNuiLkRBmS9XqImDMv1wSvDC+6Hxr6WZtZ/cA==
X-Received: by 10.31.66.141 with SMTP id p135mr1038463vka.11.1475846034576; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 06:13:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.45.211 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 06:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008E3DFD7@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <CAOxcgciQ3La-ORPFE84qZN05hNRbjLrSJNMmCe5e5pP89oKZ3g@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008E3DF7A@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAOxcgcgg-xMaJptNVQEb2bsQFg9Fiy5OCGAiXzoOUzA0SY1XmA@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008E3DFD7@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan <jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 18:43:53 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOxcgchip+vxzYHpf65SCD1vntj_4UgV65FCCwVwKPiPNBdwCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1144b326a25911053e462eee
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/FeLNXUupIHA56gs1YT5-drQE9H4>
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 13:13:58 -0000

Oh.. is it?

Thanks for your replies Med. :)

Regards,
Jay

On Friday 7 October 2016, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; wrote:

> Re-,
>
>
>
> I’m afraid there is less chance to see this revived. There is no activity
> anymore in the PCP WG.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>
>
>
> *De :* Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan [mailto:jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com');>]
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 7 octobre 2016 14:07
> *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN
> *Cc :* pcp@ietf.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pcp@ietf.org');>
> *Objet :* Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!
>
>
>
> Hi Med,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>
>
> Are you aware of any plans to revive the draft or the reasons why it was
> shelved?
>
>
>
> I feel having that document would have helped for interoperability as you
> have rightly mentioned.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jay
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mohamed.boucadair@orange.com');>> wrote:
>
> Dear Jay,
>
>
>
> Yes, that draft expired.
>
>
>
> FWIW, our PCP deployment in DS-Lite contexts adopt the following design:
>
> ·         Use plain IPv6 to contact the PCP server.
>
> ·         If no PCP server is explicitly configured, the PCP client must
> use the AFTR as its PCP server.
>
> ·         THIRD_PARTY is enabled.
>
>
>
> Having a document would be helpful for interoperability but it was not a
> blocking point in our case.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>
>
>
> *De :* pcp [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pcp-bounces@ietf.org');>] *De la part de*
> Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 7 octobre 2016 13:00
> *À :* pcp@ietf.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','pcp@ietf.org');>
> *Objet :* [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> As I can see, the draft-ietf-pcp-dslite seems to have expired quite long
> back and there is no further activity on this.
>
>
>
> I tried searching through the archives and couldn't find relevant details
> as to why it was not carried forward.
>
>
>
> Also, can someone point to me, if some other draft/RFC exists which
> relates to using PCP with DS-Lite?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jay
>
>
>