Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!

Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan <jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 07 October 2016 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F78129574 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 05:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p3XxFaGUV3Ac for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 05:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x230.google.com (mail-ua0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05488129557 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 05:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p25so43155148uaa.1 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 05:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qS6CSe1GC2dyxF7dcnTm488Wz1M/fgYF4zP5rFUpj/0=; b=Dwr3EqEteiY/XsPAFm11CLewQp1SQs/WWeuowOkOJU3YcAhhpvymCgJfvlo5Qi8mCd wJOMndBz5wlaSJ/IeQS6+MFqvZQljT2iAB2w+9XFIgAm99CbgAxqzDY4NWmM+rbNUdoe +dVOaKmf45MZz6eLBMC90C/SGqW4UssH52qCT2ULnqN6eHC58R58mUKTJuMQAt6ue+XY icORecvDySENmP0rm9IFbJ9i5KCEeMidOukxJ2C6yPgvlwOZVeKlHj1EFnHJVTtCEnMr 78VYMPfw3Azl9aL4TIa8utjTu5mHlpJhpDacnsSvL9cC+wWWC2tTOltHtikklKx7IJ0d GklQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qS6CSe1GC2dyxF7dcnTm488Wz1M/fgYF4zP5rFUpj/0=; b=jvzcGHgRWsKZxBFckfgxqpLTqx1l+YH7b2zoBIKJZh20JbVcvGi2YLwrLPiursYrk8 hI7HC1p3riTOmmABvnEmtoIYrHarXOaR2UxvwDBdS05Hywb3fyfgNDwtotDZwMz/0Z5I 2ch9y9QdGYVgcR2LOaK7NWKzPNUBovDssyJny0L0c1BObxF45PTlLScsz5dC4+IhCjBy ID7X2jXpqkYs16LaYEaSO03Wuvb48DkiiCUfnKpGhY2tgj74pmqA+aF4IDk2jtfUHwP3 mlYKX6iGC4qydTXwSPetE87jnDnuBSCknWhLckEztdq5opVzOTmmwks3V6Dwh4NvAWX6 aubQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnACtm7bvnSlEylCNs8zlk5l0ejbZKEQJJ8veC0cepE04oByUYHqZAdRDF593hn4hgWji7x1tewYcGHAA==
X-Received: by 10.176.66.132 with SMTP id j4mr8010002uaj.125.1475842039928; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 05:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.45.211 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 05:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008E3DF7A@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <CAOxcgciQ3La-ORPFE84qZN05hNRbjLrSJNMmCe5e5pP89oKZ3g@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008E3DF7A@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Jayaraghavendran Kuppannan <jayaraghavendran.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:37:19 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOxcgcgg-xMaJptNVQEb2bsQFg9Fiy5OCGAiXzoOUzA0SY1XmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a211888dce2053e454075
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/fvOathmSbAJwIIJay95bBlvCpO8>
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 12:07:22 -0000

Hi Med,

Thanks for your reply.

Are you aware of any plans to revive the draft or the reasons why it was
shelved?

I feel having that document would have helped for interoperability as you
have rightly mentioned.

Regards,
Jay



On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 5:16 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; wrote:

> Dear Jay,
>
>
>
> Yes, that draft expired.
>
>
>
> FWIW, our PCP deployment in DS-Lite contexts adopt the following design:
>
> ·         Use plain IPv6 to contact the PCP server.
>
> ·         If no PCP server is explicitly configured, the PCP client must
> use the AFTR as its PCP server.
>
> ·         THIRD_PARTY is enabled.
>
>
>
> Having a document would be helpful for interoperability but it was not a
> blocking point in our case.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>
>
>
> *De :* pcp [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] *De la part de* Jayaraghavendran
> Kuppannan
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 7 octobre 2016 13:00
> *À :* pcp@ietf.org
> *Objet :* [pcp] Query related to the status of draft-ietf-pcp-dslite!
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> As I can see, the draft-ietf-pcp-dslite seems to have expired quite long
> back and there is no further activity on this.
>
>
>
> I tried searching through the archives and couldn't find relevant details
> as to why it was not carried forward.
>
>
>
> Also, can someone point to me, if some other draft/RFC exists which
> relates to using PCP with DS-Lite?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jay
>