Re: [pcp] About selecting a key management for PCP
"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Wed, 01 August 2012 20:26 UTC
Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA69221F88D5 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBZf7USMEMMv for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2CE21F8836 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; l=1118; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1343852785; x=1345062385; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date: message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BICipMU7IgY6xb4NgSWg5Awcfh1xBarz4hrnE9sMtcM=; b=Oxa/VjMpMi/XtYbtYdjjH1Ks8lmao9oGqUJe4oGhDi6usq62KP3JuaII Iqm9fTGVXXJCjF9t8DGjLRYt44kKfBedsvRIejs3n4pqAqRuXNM/wK3Yj IWRi8W1KAmAudJd+gMgANYEmHltSMAdxUNyYuj8MbYEkNSklseaFqwXJk E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhoFALePGVCrRDoH/2dsb2JhbABFqVqPN4EHgiABAQEECAoBFxA/DAEDAgkPAgQBASgHGSMKCQgCBAESCxAHh2oMnGegQASLSYcJA4hNhQyWFYFmgn8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,696,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="51226342"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2012 20:26:24 +0000
Received: from dwingWS (sjc-vpn7-1177.cisco.com [10.21.148.153]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q71KQO8h003903; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:26:24 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: "'Zhangdacheng (Dacheng)'" <zhangdacheng@huawei.com>, pcp@ietf.org
References: <C72CBD9FE3CA604887B1B3F1D145D05E2CE62CD3@szxeml528-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <C72CBD9FE3CA604887B1B3F1D145D05E2CE62CD3@szxeml528-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:26:24 -0700
Message-ID: <0a1301cd7023$ebd1bd90$c37538b0$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQHNbwnvoZws8buZFUaBTiMDCJuBl5dFaJnQ
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'Margaret Wasserman' <mrw@painless-security.com>
Subject: Re: [pcp] About selecting a key management for PCP
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:26:26 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: pcp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pcp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Zhangdacheng (Dacheng) > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:51 AM > To: pcp@ietf.org > Cc: Margaret Wasserman > Subject: [pcp] About selecting a key management for PCP > > Hi, All: > > We have a discussion about the selection of a key management mechanism > for PCP, but there is not a conclusion yet. Basically, people focus on > two solutions, using PANA or generating an in-band authenticaiton > mchanism for PCP (actually a simplified PANA). Now, there is a new > draft draft-ohba-pcp-pana-00, which tries to specify the first one. So, > maybe it is the right time to raise this disucssion again and decide > the key management solution for PCP eventually. Yes, we need to conclude on the PCP authentication mechanism. I have high hopes for the comparison of approaches that is in PCP's agenda, https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/84/agenda/pcp, 1555-xxxx Comparison of PCP Authentication approaches (Margaret Wasserman, ??) Document: draft-ietf-pcp-authentication-00 -d
- Re: [pcp] About selecting a key management for PCP Alper Yegin
- [pcp] About selecting a key management for PCP Zhangdacheng (Dacheng)
- Re: [pcp] About selecting a key management for PCP Dan Wing
- [pcp] 答复: About selecting a key management for PCP Zhangdacheng (Dacheng)
- Re: [pcp] About selecting a key management for PCP Alper Yegin
- Re: [pcp] About selecting a key management for PCP Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)