[pim] IPR for draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Thu, 24 October 2019 17:44 UTC
Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00421200B3 for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OvfcriaDUtsO for <pim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32EBE120033 for <pim@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id c4so19325725edl.0 for <pim@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HUWKslJAuU67SColBHTUiw/OhxmKW+33rwlWw6/t1gk=; b=Znb/t8siKMjgYEv8xdChNYFIFjThI1wGwPxaQXPCImQO68ible3PK967rA9bRrV4zJ yLAgVzJ8zuACQ83SwaDKUcutxvBkvdOT7xOdEVAO0NtKP3SRNjXzXCuOzH9LVHi5l1Vd ydzRsyklwOiur0uyvD5TKGZXjcnGOAuZqyc6sVQwwZylJKyJgDSPVf1aQwSfKf/sLjFe sjyUl5vGZNOlsiy9HAKORn0Yi+jGmny3AktCoGk4lq/u0B8DLw4AdjrzQi5ck/w/iXbb mn4RF28VNVvzZZQbf3FTxRksnWw2PdTgCnOfqAx3vZ1EhoTx6NyzeR8P/gUBQ2CptWs6 azZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HUWKslJAuU67SColBHTUiw/OhxmKW+33rwlWw6/t1gk=; b=jzb1tsC8zQacwhKEg6yUoCBz8iM7LbqM8qnZn0vYNA9eDjeyrWEIx69BBgu6NQ4qhy VL/+NFffEu7PzRIoXmhErljOCM3sOwL8aqBK+l237o58sW5QBaOp0MFIu3a5qJ8CAYM+ 6n27bVO8CaV6OKy4xtQmrqXC46y64SpgU4F61ZqNZxdrYDdpW3kFburN6ilKRIVNTmlb BeqgZJQQnTyza0i6j17Wei5xCIX/6gMxSfLGabSpBUm80keHe8MsvYmmlbCr1i5YrpEP vlyvBuEK++Qj9h8cDr1nMpVPqsBW7ZRiYNhnyyU7YJYfSRDCdSnYbWNrY4wH4cHfFTu4 +h0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW1md4wRTvTdZUZmRGVYf7L/v2TsjwFzc7b0Cpxp5sZdLrEBcZ9 +uLDRGTwnizWjJDdA4cdWq56bSpwuqFDSmGpqWMG6T/FHeE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwRErQ4NScm36VAKl8uSOYVx68RZ/Tlbo5EkCQywG8ji+3mgaJoId3qtpAvWzyRkSOKm19u6PExdofs8dx/bFU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:213c:: with SMTP id qo28mr24675425ejb.43.1571939043596; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:43:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHANBtK4bQiGv0pdW6zgDHwNHLA=9jVgP=2ayjR5H-1fgcS4qw@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/7LBfuQAownskNm6jbX2LrgPpeq4>
Subject: [pim] IPR for draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:44:07 -0000
Hi When I was asking for IPR on draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang I accidentally didn't copy the group, I should have as it should be public whether people claim IPR or not. I got responses from all the authors, but this draft has additional contributors, and we need all contributors to respond. If you are a contributor, please reply to this email, copying the list, and let us know if you are aware of any IPR related to this document. If anyone in the WG, not just authors/contributors, are aware of any related IPR, please let us know as well. Below I've copied the IPR responses I got from the authors. Stig Response from zhang.zheng@zte.com.cn on May 8th: --- Hi Stig, Thank you for your reminder! I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Best Regards, Sandy --- May 9th from <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> --- I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks, - Xufeng --- Also May 9th from <sivakumar.mahesh@gmail.com>: --- Not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks Mahesh --- On Jun 5th from <guofeng@huawei.com>: --- Hi, I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Thanks, Feng --- On Jun 27th from <anish.ietf@gmail.com>: --- Hi Stig, Sorry for the delay. I am not aware of any IPR, please proceed towards publication. Thanks, Anish --- On Jul 16th from <Pete.McAllister@metaswitch.com>: --- Sorry for still more delay! No IPR from me, go ahead ---
- [pim] IPR for draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang Stig Venaas
- Re: [pim] IPR for draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang Stig Venaas
- Re: [pim] IPR for draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang xu.benchong
- Re: [pim] IPR for draft-ietf-pim-msdp-yang Liuyisong