[pim] Interesting issue with PIM YANG modules
Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> Sat, 17 March 2018 15:13 UTC
Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A3C12895E; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kWanFiyVbICP; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF4E126B6E; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=289; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1521299613; x=1522509213; h=to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=pjQDwiFaKixpvS783Bq2+2eegZPiLCION2y671KloeI=; b=DFuIBPvNdjI4Ey3Dcd2QO8HF9wGC0Na2xDPHmoM0if04XcM/wMX1Ce6G 1Ht35TcAXbX2yznnHYNL3H4z9aF8wVSHBBTcHd3UdeC+NiP3k4PHuR4aC aqwv9spmL5xDPpbWRftYPQ9rPdZ/PwVco1WMjz4rxkF5SNJOlzmlqNgyi Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DPAAA+MK1a/51dJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNQgViEBYoajXqBT4FKlACCEguFBgqDNyE0GAECAQEBAQEBAmsohU9WNQImAmwIAQGFFK0EgiaEboNrgg6BDIQnghWBVYF8iEqCPIJhA4kYjx4JgUWNZQeBPQGGW4UUkDWBKh44gVJNIxWCfpEGJJBTAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,321,1517875200"; d="scan'208";a="85511361"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2018 15:13:32 +0000
Received: from [10.82.246.165] (rtp-vpn2-1699.cisco.com [10.82.246.165]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2HFDVSD002607; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 15:13:31 GMT
To: draft-ietf-pim-yang@ietf.org
Cc: pim@ietf.org
From: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco
Message-ID: <b9980a00-d050-90c6-82ca-eddb9117accf@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 11:13:31 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pim/F_lxIhcpofQrDO9J_EwuqC9Uvtg>
Subject: [pim] Interesting issue with PIM YANG modules
X-BeenThere: pim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol Independent Multicast <pim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pim/>
List-Post: <mailto:pim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pim>, <mailto:pim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 15:13:34 -0000
Benoit and I are in the hackathon working on some Yang Catalog items, and we noticed that in the latest revision of this draft, the YANG modules all have a revision of 2018-02-29. Unfortunately, there were only 28 days in February 2018, so this was breaking our toolchain :-). Joe
- [pim] Interesting issue with PIM YANG modules Joe Clarke
- Re: [pim] Interesting issue with PIM YANG modules xufeng.liu.ietf
- Re: [pim] Interesting issue with PIM YANG modules Joe Clarke