Re: [precis] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-07

Peter Saint-Andre - Filament <peter@filament.com> Mon, 05 June 2017 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@filament.com>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7584D129409 for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=filament-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QeJdd7BCHzSe for <precis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 974E71293EB for <precis@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id m47so74738401iti.1 for <precis@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=filament-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fyf29xjVdadQ/A1qPiRvpJSTIExvLYJK2lb+FCzTP4M=; b=AOcbW9/YfTO/KmrL4qFTZdgsHSpkpmnHQYSERdsupGrLvb++AVYXvM6a12yN3CYJ81 9IQOJfKYNN1q87FrYzN5YEN8WYP8Ve9XOCs9yFGeeMF4j95yzzx1F1oWHjXxJfi6b+mU fEWHR4Gh9psTUfJK/EXFKOOT8xdNZGzgHyJQzNlDh3/qknd55WQpL8o+DmFNLDFzrdKu nqEokQ6QDj4bXOL3llE887+ptIVNa2oagBWfAvC8jiJOlpNtE3oidN0s6b12EmVWwmnU baIHSe3m+L8fN1N9knDt/xt2AOrWyyE9NFF+KNyaPSW0UJAScGgUoMZhkGprRwBvr/tC F4gQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fyf29xjVdadQ/A1qPiRvpJSTIExvLYJK2lb+FCzTP4M=; b=PHzAfVlC2U40UXqoEuqlsBjZIF6v7XY3k1juZkT6dndP5zUqYA1zC748aDQR9AZJX9 T9HWa2QL5C6MnHwmedxe5hqyltwq523u2yQjOaAyB7zss5gqcEUGMF4x6oMJBhAXwuyu mAnoirGe1bS2cjGehR3VtDvPh9gihMe8Qjeo9nEIGmcoWjqlHyKi0QcIWfiM/Xjr3qOg mF5px/LkjemSBXUwTUcI+poAuHEw/lX3phXCGu9FY9yHaa6kra98lmtmMsHx1E+WQUBW GXphsT5PbczoB7LfJi0zunAndg+NluXC42I6QhKH9TuHVv1w8iq9NTd6V1/Uz523izd8 /88w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCNbSmo4Vu5GKd5SrpBnYY8QcR7Fg95wIowsJDA0LI0vKQXcUhU fhnlNN9MVMSSlfbo
X-Received: by 10.107.147.86 with SMTP id v83mr23927796iod.233.1496695883000; Mon, 05 Jun 2017 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local (c-98-245-40-52.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [98.245.40.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e73sm2168056ioj.17.2017.06.05.13.51.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Jun 2017 13:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, gen-art@ietf.org
References: <149626145570.19916.16628797750334932421@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: precis@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-precis-7700bis.all@ietf.org
From: Peter Saint-Andre - Filament <peter@filament.com>
Message-ID: <322a3c4f-24d7-f971-663e-50d4e64eb25d@filament.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 14:51:20 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <149626145570.19916.16628797750334932421@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/E23Bqf9OZ_35Pi06VguPm6J8LqE>
Subject: Re: [precis] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-07
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 20:51:26 -0000

Hi Russ, thanks for your review and my apologies for the delayed reply.

On 5/31/17 2:10 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>;.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-precis-7700bis-07
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2017-05-31
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-13
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-07-06
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Major Concerns: None
> 
> Minor Concerns: None
> 
> Nits:
> 
> Section 2.3 includes this note:
> 
>    Note: An entity SHOULD NOT apply the Case Mapping Rule during
>    enforcement, because typically it is appropriate only during
>    comparison.
> 
> I question the inclusion of "typically" in this note.  Can you simply
> say that the Case Mapping Rule SHOULD only be used during comparison?

That seems better, yes!

Peter