RE: [proto-team] PROTO template differences

"Mankin, Allison J" <amankin@nsf.gov> Wed, 18 April 2007 19:02 UTC

Return-path: <proto-team-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeFPo-0005xy-HX; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:02:04 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeFPm-0005xY-E1; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:02:02 -0400
Received: from corvus.nsf.gov ([198.181.231.29]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HeFPk-00009V-5G; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:02:02 -0400
Received: from nsf-fe-02.nsf.gov (HELO nsf-fe-02.ad.nsf.gov) ([128.150.4.152]) by corvus.nsf.gov with ESMTP; 18 Apr 2007 15:01:56 -0400
X-SBRS: None
Received: from NSF-BE-03.ad.nsf.gov ([128.150.130.228]) by nsf-fe-02.ad.nsf.gov with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:02:14 -0400
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [proto-team] PROTO template differences
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:02:14 -0400
Message-ID: <3E387C1C64088E499E7BF0E86B0E1BF7794225@NSF-BE-03.ad.nsf.gov>
In-Reply-To: <E1D5C12C-BB6A-422B-8C41-C570D9B97E97@nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [proto-team] PROTO template differences
Thread-Index: AceB5/1/T3scgorqTXiTtZcDGsBtBwAA9Uzw
References: <E1D5C12C-BB6A-422B-8C41-C570D9B97E97@nokia.com>
From: "Mankin, Allison J" <amankin@nsf.gov>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Apr 2007 19:02:14.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[13940080:01C781EC]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc: proto-team@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org

 Lars,

In the revision of RFC 2434bis, there's a thought of announcing the
appointment of any IANA
Expert in the Document Announcement.  That question does not capture the
point, but I think this may be why it is there.

Allison

-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert@nokia.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:45 PM
To: IESG IESG
Cc: proto-team@ietf.org
Subject: [proto-team] PROTO template differences

Hi,

I just realized that the PROTO writeup templates in draft-ietf-proto-
wgchair-doc-shepherding-09 and the one at http://www.ietf.org/IESG/
content/Doc-Writeup.html are different, in that the web page one adds a
question to the announcement write-up:

   Personnel
     Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Who is the
     Responsible Area Director? Is an IANA expert needed?
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I don't know where that change originated from, but an answer to that
question IMO doesn't make sense to have in the document announcement.  
Plus, question 1.i already requests information about IANA experts.

Can we undo that addition, please?

Lars


_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team