Re: epp via smtp
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 07 September 2002 20:43 UTC
Received: from nic.cafax.se (nic.cafax.se [192.71.228.17]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA18216 for <provreg-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 16:43:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nic.cafax.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g87Kcto2022359 for <ietf-provreg-outgoing@nic.cafax.se>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 22:38:55 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g87KctYE022358 for ietf-provreg-outgoing; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 22:38:55 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nic.cafax.se: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se using -f
Received: from joy.songbird.com (songbird.com [208.184.79.7]) by nic.cafax.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g87Kcro2022353 for <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 22:38:54 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from bbprime.dcrocker.net (208.184.79.252.songbird.com [208.184.79.252] (may be forged)) by joy.songbird.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA15418; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 13:50:54 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.1.2.2.20020907132647.022adff8@jay.songbird.com>
X-Sender: dhc@jay.songbird.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1.3 (Beta)
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 13:38:11 -0700
To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: epp via smtp
Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
In-Reply-To: <200209071732.g87HW5g0000485@nic-naa.net>
References: <Your message of "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 10:26:12 PDT." <5.1.1.2.2.20020907102329.033b0de8@jay.songbird.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Precedence: bulk
At 01:32 PM 9/7/2002 -0400, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: > > the operative part of the question was the word "convert". > >I can't help you on matters of faith. Then it's a good thing this was about your clarifying what you meant, rather than any sort of matter of faith, on the theory that you used the word "convert" to refer to something technical. To refresh your memory, you said: >What it really does is convert SMTP sessions (optionally containing EPP >messages) to/from (optionally) EPP messages? So the question is what you mean by "covert smtp session"? What does it mean to convert an smtp session to/from an application message? d/ ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:dave@tribalwise.com> TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com> tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850
- epp via smtp Edward Lewis
- RE: epp via smtp Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: epp via smtp Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: epp via smtp Dave Crocker
- Re: epp via smtp Edward Lewis
- Re: epp via smtp Edward Lewis
- Re: epp via smtp Edmon Chung
- Re: epp via smtp Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: epp via smtp Edmon Chung
- Re: epp via smtp Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: epp via smtp Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: epp via smtp Dave Crocker
- Re: epp via smtp Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: epp via smtp Dave Crocker
- Re: epp via smtp Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: epp via smtp Dave Crocker
- Re: epp via smtp Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: epp via smtp Dave Crocker
- Re: epp via smtp Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine