New Liaison Statement, "LS on 3GPP CT WG4 feedback on QUIC network level troubleshooting capabilities"

Liaison Statement Management Tool <statements@ietf.org> Mon, 14 October 2019 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <statements@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietf.org
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2B2120914; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Liaison Statement Management Tool <statements@ietf.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, QUIC Discussion List <quic@ietf.org>, georg.mayer.huawei@gmx.com, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, 3GPPLiaison@etsi.org
Subject: New Liaison Statement, "LS on 3GPP CT WG4 feedback on QUIC network level troubleshooting capabilities"
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.105.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <157107290622.24688.13746109096420368827.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:08:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/1H5xh4j8r_pgYADPag9vOgVsdW0>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 17:08:26 -0000

Title: LS on 3GPP CT WG4 feedback on QUIC network level troubleshooting capabilities
Submission Date: 2019-10-14
URL of the IETF Web page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1655/
Please reply by 2020-02-14
From: Susanna Kooistra <3GPPLiaison@etsi.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>,Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>,QUIC Discussion List <quic@ietf.org>,Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>,Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>,Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Response Contacts: georg.mayer.huawei@gmx.com,3GPPLiaison@etsi.org
Technical Contacts: 
Purpose: For action

Body: 1. Overall Description:
3GPP CT WG4 is performing a feasibility study on the potential usage of QUIC protocol for the 3GPP 5G Core Network in 3GPP°TR°29.893 (last version available via the following link: https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/29_series/29.893/29893-120.zip). 3GPP CT WG4 is currently waiting for the release of the first official version of QUIC RFC in order to resume and conclude this study.

3GPP CT4 WG hence reviewed the IETF draft-ietf-quic-transport-19 and would like to provide the following feedback on network level troubleshooting capabilities of QUIC as compared to TCP (cf. clause°9.6.3 of 3GPP TR°29.893 for more details):

-	QUIC replaces both TLS and TCP. One of the main differences indeed is that QUIC encrypts the transport headers in addition to the payload, which is highly relevant for the network level troubleshooting matters. The existing Network OAM (Operation And Maintenance) solutions which are designed to make use and act on TCP headers would hence not be able to troubleshoot QUIC traffic and even less be easily adaptable to perform this task.
-	QUIC includes an optional measurement bit, named spinbit, which allows in-path probes to measure both the round trip delay and the decomposition of the delay on both sides of symmetrical path.
-	As of version 19, QUIC specifications do not support packet loss measurements.
-	To enable an in depth analysis of the performance (e.g. flow control, etc.) between a consumer 3GPP 5G core Network Function (NF) and a producer NF, the decryption of the entire QUIC message is often required in order to read the transport parameters of the QUIC packet header. Contrary to HTTP/2 over TLS, this has the side effect of decrypting and revealing application layer information to network probes.

2. Actions:
To IETF QUIC group
ACTION: 	3GPP CT WG4 kindly asks IETF QUIC WG to take the above feedback into consideration in QUIC version 1 specification and provide a feedback (especially on the highlighted points). 

3. Date of Next CT4 Meetings:
3GPP TSG CT4#95	11th – 15th November 2019	Reno, US
3GPP TSG CT4#96	24th – 28th February 2020	Sophia Antipolis, FR
Attachments:

    Liaison Statement on QUIC network level troubleshooting capabilities
    https://www.ietf.org/lib/dt/documents/LIAISON/liaison-2019-10-14-3gpp-tsgct-ct4-quic-ls-on-3gpp-ct-wg4-feedback-on-quic-network-level-troubleshooting-capabilities-attachment-1.docx